- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 08:39:01 +0200
- To: "Alessandro Vernet" <avernet@orbeon.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
My two cents I don't like extension-prefixes, because we HAVE extension and we don't want the processor to ignore them Even if ignored-prefixes seems awkward, it is clearer for what it is really used for Mohamed On 3/29/07, Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com> wrote: > > On 3/24/07, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@sun.com> wrote: > > | 1) Are we calling it ignored-prefixes, or extension-prefixes? > > > > We're currently calling it ignored-prefixes, I think, though now that > > we have p:doc, I think I'd be in favor of changing its name. > > +1 for changing the name. > > And for consistency, I would pick the same name we have in XSLT, and > call this p:extension-element-prefixes. > > Alex > -- > Orbeon Forms - Web 2.0 Forms for the Enterprise > http://www.orbeon.com/ > > -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 8 72 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Thursday, 29 March 2007 06:39:06 UTC