- From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 10:45:07 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 15 March 2007 14:46:46 UTC
/ ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) was heard to say: | Alex Milowski writes: | |> * In ยง5, many of the content models have a preferred order for p:input, |> p:output, |> p:parameter, etc. Why wouldn't we just have a model that allows them in |> any order: |> |> (p:input|p:output|p:parameter|...)* | | I like it the way it is. If order isn't significant, pick an order | and require it. Me too. |> * Why don't we use xs:boolean for boolean flags instead of "yes" and "no" |> (e.g. the sequence attribute on p:input)? | | Hear hear! No. We don't use any XSD types anywhere else, why here? I don't plan to have an XSD-aware XProc pipeline processor. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh XML Standards Architect Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Received on Thursday, 15 March 2007 14:46:46 UTC