- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 09:38:29 +0200
- To: "Norman Walsh" <Norman.Walsh@sun.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
On 3/29/07, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@sun.com> wrote: > / Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say: > | Caching can be about telling to the process, something has already > | been processed so you don't need to redo it : Fine, that's one > | interpretation > > Our language doesn't do dependency tracking and we've already > explicitly said that you can't assume that steps are functional and > side-effect free, so I don't think a conformant app can cache in that > sense. > > | The other one caching of URIReference that says when you overload the > | URIResolver you can reroute the resolution to something in the pipe or > | outside > | > | Are thoses issues separated ? > > They are in my mind. Ok ! Fine ! So what is the scope of "caching" in this thread ? > > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norman Walsh > XML Standards Architect > Sun Microsystems, Inc. > > -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 8 72 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Friday, 30 March 2007 07:38:35 UTC