- From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:15:18 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 28 March 2007 20:15:30 UTC
/ Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say: | Dear, | | It is clear, that we need ignored prefixes, but it is unclear at all | that we need to have already a namespace set in ignored namespaces | | Why is not SVG and MathML also in ? and hundreds of "obvious" others ? | | I really prefer to see none at start I agree. When the ignored-prefixes was the mechanism for documentation, putting XHTML in there by default made some sense. Now that we have p:doc, I don't think it does. (In fact, I almost removed it in the latest draft but decided that was more than editorial.) Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh XML Standards Architect Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Received on Wednesday, 28 March 2007 20:15:30 UTC