- From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:15:18 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 28 March 2007 20:15:30 UTC
/ Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say:
| Dear,
|
| It is clear, that we need ignored prefixes, but it is unclear at all
| that we need to have already a namespace set in ignored namespaces
|
| Why is not SVG and MathML also in ? and hundreds of "obvious" others ?
|
| I really prefer to see none at start
I agree. When the ignored-prefixes was the mechanism for
documentation, putting XHTML in there by default made some sense. Now
that we have p:doc, I don't think it does. (In fact, I almost removed
it in the latest draft but decided that was more than editorial.)
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh
XML Standards Architect
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Received on Wednesday, 28 March 2007 20:15:30 UTC