- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 11:54:10 +0000
- To: "Innovimax SARL" <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Innovimax SARL writes:
> Because it should be positionned for ad hoc component
> <my:xslt p:ignore-prefixes="my">
> ...
> </my:xslt>
Yeah, I guessed something like that, but since
a) I'm opposed to user-defined compound steps in v.1 and
b) it makes no sense on atomic steps
I think the confusion it will engender is much greater than any
possible benefit.
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFF9+JikjnJixAXWBoRAgLCAJ9MoickDfGcu7gsmsAuM5W0RLO9SACfb3z6
m6uuhdREUHdrwxsWfPRWlGw=
=YZzb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 14 March 2007 11:54:27 UTC