- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 15:06:12 +0000
- To: "Alex Milowski" <alex@milowski.org>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Alex Milowski writes:
>
> The problem is that the in-scope namespaces has namespaces
> that aren't declared on that element. As such, you need to fabricate
> the namespace declarations. This is the difference between the
> [in-scope namespaces] property and the [namespace attributes]
> property of the element information item.
I still don't see your point. The infoset has all the information the
pipeline needs. Serialisation of such a document has work to do, but
that's always the case when sub-trees are serialised.
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFF+A9kkjnJixAXWBoRAtj/AJ4o+MIb0K5icXo3KC6wV+sXCf2V4ACaA/3w
tB3o+51qvHlGJaWvbmOPcLw=
=uFqH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 14 March 2007 15:07:23 UTC