- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 15:06:12 +0000
- To: "Alex Milowski" <alex@milowski.org>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Alex Milowski writes: > > The problem is that the in-scope namespaces has namespaces > that aren't declared on that element. As such, you need to fabricate > the namespace declarations. This is the difference between the > [in-scope namespaces] property and the [namespace attributes] > property of the element information item. I still don't see your point. The infoset has all the information the pipeline needs. Serialisation of such a document has work to do, but that's always the case when sub-trees are serialised. ht - -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh Half-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFF+A9kkjnJixAXWBoRAtj/AJ4o+MIb0K5icXo3KC6wV+sXCf2V4ACaA/3w tB3o+51qvHlGJaWvbmOPcLw= =uFqH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 14 March 2007 15:07:23 UTC