- From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 10:43:38 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <878xdp1gpx.fsf@nwalsh.com>
Reviewing the last week's mail, I find the following open issues
for discussion: (Apologies if these are cryptic, typing fast...)
1. Placement of ignored content?
Inside p:pipe, p:document, p:inline?
2. Allow p:ignored-prefixes everywhere?
3. XHTML in the ignored namespaces by default?
4. Ability to remove things from ignored namespaces?
5. Import precedence
Can you replace a declared-step or pipeline with another
with exactly the same signature
The space is flat, right?
6. Pipeline visibility
Two pipelines in the same library can see each other?
Order is insignificant?
7. Order of input/output/param/option
Fixed or (choice)*
8. Interpretation of type name on declare-step
Unprefixed is in no namespace or default namespace
Steps in no namespace are not allowed
9. Names of pipelines
NCNames in a namespace per the library (status quo)
exported-name attribute (Jeni)
separate namespace attribute on pipeline?
10. Solution for the caching problem
*-with-sequence
general caching
cache input to p:group
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh
XML Standards Architect
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Received on Thursday, 22 March 2007 14:43:45 UTC