- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:05:01 +0000
- To: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Norman Walsh writes:
> If we are going to allow redefinition, for the use case where you really
> like a library but you want to change one pipeline or component, I think
> I could live with a rule that says:
>
> 1. The signatures must be identical
> 2. The redefined step/pipeline completely masks the other definition.
> In other words, the space of declared steps/pipelines is completely
> flat.
Yes, that's what I would have expected -- if lib/a calls lib/b, and
you override b, lib/a now will call the new defn.
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGATuNkjnJixAXWBoRAnMzAJ9Ij63dqzhETrX3bvqBTTM3Ec4K2gCgg0Ql
09Ed5S3iAPsHQ73+xmbZGN4=
=6hy5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 21 March 2007 14:05:10 UTC