- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 16:28:20 +0100
- To: "Norman Walsh" <Norman.Walsh@sun.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
On 3/12/07, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@sun.com> wrote: > / Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> was heard to say: > | Alex Milowski wrote: > |> I think it would be nice to rename 'viewport-source' and > |> 'iteration-source' to > |> just a plain 'source' element. The 'source' element specifies an input > |> where the context (or port) is assumed ( e.g. the target of the viewporting > |> or iteration). > | > | I agree. > > So you'd both prefer "source" on viewport and for-each but > "xpath-context" on choose/when? What are we going to do with the fact that iteration-source allow @select but none of of the other ? And about the fact that iteration-source allow zero or more flows but the other two one and only one flow ? > > If that's what the group wants, I'm not going to stand in the way, but > there's a part of me that thinks it would be better for all three to > be the same or all three to be different. > > In other wordes iteration-source, for-each-source, and xpath-context > or "source" in all three places. > > (I had considered suggesting source in all three places myself, but > decided not to bother in the interest of getting to Last Call.) > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norman Walsh > XML Standards Architect > Sun Microsystems, Inc. > > -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 8 72 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Monday, 12 March 2007 15:28:28 UTC