Re: pipe/@step

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Norman Walsh writes:

> / ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) was heard to say:
> | Described simply as 'step-name' in current (and other) drafts -- I
> | guess, with some confusion, this has to be QName, so that ports on the
> | containing pipeline can be referenced.  But that means confusion wrt
> | the default namespace binding.
>
> Perhaps. I had thought that we'd use XSLT rules. If it has no prefix,
> it is in no namespace irrespective of the default namespace.

So that's why you're not calling it a QName, perhaps?

Need to make this clear, in any case.

ht
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFF+V3fkjnJixAXWBoRAvUfAJ9cGJgAHbk/hKYEPB4puJ1vgE3awgCfRSFY
+xElFgxqR1FnaqM4sLoFh5I=
=5wKv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Thursday, 15 March 2007 14:53:26 UTC