- From: Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 16:26:19 -0700
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
On 3/21/07, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@sun.com> wrote:
> I'm not entirely sure I like having documentation inside p:inline, but
> it is certainly possible to write a consistent story about it.
Are you saying that right now one could write:
<p:xslt name="t">
<p:input port="stylesheet">
<p:inline>
<xhtml:p>Let me tell you what this does</xhtml:p>
<xsl:stylesheet>...</xsl:stylesheet>
</p:inline>
</p:input>
<p:input port="source">
<p:inline>
<xhtml:p>Some document to transform</xhtml:p>
</p:inline>
</p:input>
</p:xslt>
And the <xsl:stylesheet> element would be passed to XSLT as the
stylesheet, ignoring the <xhtml:p> element? Then how could I pass
XHTML to the 'source' input?
I am not sure that allowing documentation in <p:input> is a good idea.
And I am not sure that using an element in the XHTML namespace as the
root element for your documentation is a good idea either.
Alex
--
Orbeon Forms - Web 2.0 Forms for the Enterprise
http://www.orbeon.com/
Received on Wednesday, 21 March 2007 23:26:31 UTC