- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 21:33:48 +0000
- To: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Norman Walsh writes:
> Comments? At the moment, you can us an empty p:inline to specify an
> empty sequence of documents. That's the only value I can see.
Um, as I understand it you use an empty <p:input/> to specify an empty
sequence of documents. We don't need the flexibility at both levels
of the tree -- I'm with Alex on this one.
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFF+bu9kjnJixAXWBoRAq5CAJ9ZMmvEmUX9rlYfJpwM1iueghsRswCcCDr+
XaKw914X9ioGp3ZBOlcvIAw=
=ZiZA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 15 March 2007 21:33:58 UTC