public-ws-policy@w3.org from January 2007 by subject

...[GUIDELINES] Use of @wsp:optional and @wsp:Ignorable on an assertion (Issue

[Bug 4210] WSDL WG Editorial comments on Framework

[Bug 4211] WSDL WG Editorial comments on Attachment

[Bug 4235] clarification needed to sect 4.3 to indicate that the normalization algorithm can be applied to wsp:Policy element used as XML element policy attachment

[Bug 4240] Title: The distribution example does not follow the axioms in Section 4.3.3

[DRAFT] Agenda: WS-Policy WG F2F 24 - 2007-01-16 to 2007-01-18

[Guidelines] NEW ISSUE 4198: Policy assertion semantics independent of attachment mechanism

[NEW ISSUE] 4103 Questionable use of Contoso Ltd in Primer

[NEW ISSUE] 4150 Duplicate text exists in Section 3 and 3.2, PolicyAttachment

[NEW ISSUE] 4177 Disambiguate notational convention for choice syntax

[NEW ISSUE] 4197 LC Inconsistency on treatment of unknown extensibility elements (Framework, Primer, Guidelines)

[NEW ISSUE] 4230 normative text masquerading as non-normative guidance (Attachment)

[NEW ISSUE] 4235 clarification needed to sect 4.3 to indicate that the normalization algorithm can be applied to wsp:Policy element used as XML element policy attachment

[NEW ISSUE] 4238 framework spec does not formally define syntax (outline, etc) for compact form policy expression

[NEW ISSUE] 4253 [Primer] Basic Concepts section on Policy does not explain usage reasonably

[NEW ISSUE] 4255 [Primer] Section 2.9 should also explain basic attaching

[NEW ISSUE] How to ignore some "ignorable" assertions only?

[NEW ISSUE] Primer: Absence of Policy Assertions (editorial) [Issue 4288]

[NEW ISSUE]: 4196 Clarify namespace restrictions (Framework and Primer)

[NEW ISSUE]: 4203 Introduction misleading (Framework)

[NEW ISSUE]: 4204 misleading text in sect 2.3 (Framework)

[NEW ISSUE]: 4205 editorial nits WS-Policy 1.5 - Framework

[NEW ISSUE]: 4207 misleading text in sect 2.2 (Attachments)

[NEW ISSUE]: LC Comments from SAWSDL WG

[Primer] Proposal to close action 196

[UPDATE] 4196 Minor Updates to Issue and Proposal

[UPDATE] Issue 4206 - Updated Framework Proposal Only

[V.Next] 4178 Declaration of policy domains in policy expressions

[V.Next] 4179 Preferences for policy expressions

[VER2] Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 22 - 2007-01-03

[VER3] Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 22 - 2007-01-03

[WS Policy Working Group Jan 2007 f2f day 2 2007-01-17] minutes (DRAFT)

action 173 issue 4045 scoping of wsdl1.1 identifiers

ACTION-152 Review 4.4.8 with respect to the addition of the ignorable attribute

ACTION-174: See what XPointer are in line with WSDL and syntax

Agenda: WS-Policy WG F2F 24 - 2007-01-16 to 2007-01-18

Agenda: WS-Policy WG telcon 25 - 2007-01-31

Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 23 - 2007-01-10

AI 175 done

Bug 4208: identifiers should use WSDL 1.1 element names not WSDL 2.0 component names

Bug 4270: Primer versioning example

Candidate CR Drafts

Candidate Recommendation schedule and exit criteria

Comment on Fragment Identifiers

Concrete Proposal Around 3619

Editorial issues in the Attachment spec

Editorial issues in the Framework spec

I volunteer for the UDDI scenario / test case definition work

Initial proposal for Issue 4041

IRC Channel is down.

Issue 3953 [Guidelines] Update to issue on domain interactions and assertion nesting

Issue 4128 -- Action Item Dan Roth, Ashok Malhotra

Issue 4225 (was RE: Editorial issues in the Framework spec

Issue 4226 (was RE: Editorial issues in the Attachment spec

Issues omitted from f2f agenda

Last Call for C14N 1.1

Last Call for C14N 1.1 (and updated WG notes)

LC Comments from SAWSDL WG (WS Policy issue 4188)

NEW ISSUE (4072): [Guidance] Statements not relevant to assertion design

NEW ISSUE (4263) [Primer] Inform domain specific processing of ignorability of assertions

NEW ISSUE 4127: Proposed WSDL 1.1 element identifiers can not deal with operation name overloading

NEW ISSUE 4128: Add References to WSDL 1.1 and WSDL 2.0 Component Syntax

NEW ISSUE 4129: Attaching Policies to EPRs

NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored

NEW ISSUE 4138: Normalization Algorithm is broken

NEW Issue 4195: How to ignore some "ignorable" assertions only?

NEW ISSUE 4206: Clarify treatment of policy assertion parameters in compatibility determination

NEW ISSUE 4209: Example 3.1 does not follow the algorithm/definition in merging policies

NEW ISSUE 4224: [Framewokrk] Section 4, last paragraph content is too restrictive - policy element information items are processed in multiple contexts

NEW ISSUE 4224: [Framework] Section 4, last paragraph content is too restrictive - policy element information items are processed in multiple contexts

NEW ISSUE 4251 - Change syntax of some WSDL 1.1 identifiers

New ISSUE 4254: Ownership of WSP namespace

NEW ISSUE: 3986 [Guidelines] Parameter vs. Nested Policy Decision at Domain Level?

NEW ISSUE: 4142 Contradictory recommendation for nesting and intersection

NEW ISSUE: [GUIDELINES] Use of @wsp:optional and @wsp:Ignorab le o n the same assertion

NEW ISSUE: [GUIDELINES] Use of @wsp:optional and @wsp:Ignorable o n the same assertion

NEW ISSUE: Contradictory recommendation for nesting and intersection

NEW ISSUE: Example 3.1 does not follow the algorithm/definition in merging policies

NEW Issue: How to ignore some "ignorable" assertions only?

NEW ISSUE: Normalization Algorithm is broken

NEW ISSUE: Policy parameter definition is not accurate

policy scenarios and test cases

proposal for ACTION 181

Proposed Resolutions to 4238 and 4196

Proposed solution for Issue 4141

resolution to 4238 and 4196

resolutions to 4204 and 4207

ROUGH outkine of steps with suggested dates

Solution space for Issue 4127: Proposed WSDL 1.1 element identifiers can not deal with operation name overloading

Suggested Feedback to WS-Policy

Updated Policy Drafts

Use of empty policy for nesting should be exemplified

WS-Addressing comments relating to WS-Policy LC

ws-policy 12/20/2006: Updated Issue and Proposal - Issue 4069

WS-Policy Features and Interop Scenarios

WSDL WG interest in WS-Policy issues

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 January 2007 00:31:22 UTC