Amelia A Lewis
Anish Karmarkar
Anthony Nadalin
Ashok Malhotra
- RE: NEW ISSUE 4251 - Change syntax of some WSDL 1.1 identifiers (Thursday, 18 January)
- NEW ISSUE 4251 - Change syntax of some WSDL 1.1 identifiers (Wednesday, 17 January)
- Suggested Feedback to WS-Policy (Thursday, 11 January)
- RE: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored (Tuesday, 9 January)
- RE: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored (Tuesday, 9 January)
- RE: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored (Sunday, 7 January)
- RE: Issue 4128 -- Action Item Dan Roth, Ashok Malhotra (Thursday, 4 January)
- RE: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored (Tuesday, 2 January)
- NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored (Tuesday, 2 January)
- NEW ISSUE 4129: Attaching Policies to EPRs (Tuesday, 2 January)
- NEW ISSUE 4128: Add References to WSDL 1.1 and WSDL 2.0 Component Syntax (Tuesday, 2 January)
Asir Vedamuthu
- RE: Bug 4270: Primer versioning example (Wednesday, 31 January)
- RE: NEW ISSUE (4072): [Guidance] Statements not relevant to assertion design (Wednesday, 31 January)
- RE: Issue 3953 [Guidelines] Update to issue on domain interactions and assertion nesting (Tuesday, 30 January)
- RE: NEW ISSUE (4263) [Primer] Inform domain specific processing of ignorability of assertions (Tuesday, 30 January)
- RE: Candidate CR Drafts (Thursday, 25 January)
- Candidate CR Drafts (Thursday, 25 January)
- RE: policy scenarios and test cases (Tuesday, 23 January)
- Proposed Resolutions to 4238 and 4196 (Thursday, 18 January)
- RE: [Bug 4235] clarification needed to sect 4.3 to indicate that the normalization algorithm can be applied to wsp:Policy element used as XML element policy attachment (Wednesday, 17 January)
- FW: [Bug 4240] Title: The distribution example does not follow the axioms in Section 4.3.3 (Wednesday, 17 January)
- RE: [Bug 4235] clarification needed to sect 4.3 to indicate that the normalization algorithm can be applied to wsp:Policy element used as XML element policy attachment (Wednesday, 17 January)
- RE: NEW ISSUE 4138: Normalization Algorithm is broken (Wednesday, 17 January)
- WS-Policy Features and Interop Scenarios (Tuesday, 16 January)
- RE: NEW ISSUE 4138: Normalization Algorithm is broken (Tuesday, 16 January)
- RE: NEW Issue 4195: How to ignore some "ignorable" assertions only? (Tuesday, 16 January)
- RE: proposal for ACTION 181 (Tuesday, 16 January)
- RE: [NEW ISSUE] 4230 normative text masquerading as non-normative guidance (Attachment) (Tuesday, 16 January)
- Issue 4225 (was RE: Editorial issues in the Framework spec (Monday, 15 January)
- Issue 4226 (was RE: Editorial issues in the Attachment spec (Monday, 15 January)
- RE: NEW ISSUE 4209: Example 3.1 does not follow the algorithm/definition in merging policies (Monday, 15 January)
- RE: NEW ISSUE 4138: Normalization Algorithm is broken (Monday, 15 January)
- RE: [NEW ISSUE]: 4204 misleading text in sect 2.3 (Framework) (Sunday, 14 January)
- RE: [Bug 4211] WSDL WG Editorial comments on Attachment (Sunday, 14 January)
- RE: [Bug 4210] WSDL WG Editorial comments on Framework (Sunday, 14 January)
- RE: [NEW ISSUE]: LC Comments from SAWSDL WG (Sunday, 14 January)
- RE: NEW Issue: How to ignore some "ignorable" assertions only? (Sunday, 14 January)
- RE: NEW ISSUE 4209: Example 3.1 does not follow the algorithm/definition in merging policies (Saturday, 13 January)
- RE: NEW ISSUE: 4142 Contradictory recommendation for nesting and intersection (Saturday, 13 January)
- RE: [NEW ISSUE]: 4203 Introduction misleading (Framework) (Saturday, 13 January)
- RE: [NEW ISSUE]: 4207 misleading text in sect 2.2 (Attachments) (Saturday, 13 January)
- RE: [NEW ISSUE]: 4205 editorial nits WS-Policy 1.5 - Framework (Saturday, 13 January)
- RE: [NEW ISSUE] 4177 Disambiguate notational convention for choice syntax (Friday, 12 January)
- RE: [NEW ISSUE] 4197 LC Inconsistency on treatment of unknown extensibility elements (Framework, Primer, Guidelines) (Friday, 12 January)
- RE: [NEW ISSUE] 4150 Duplicate text exists in Section 3 and 3.2, PolicyAttachment (Wednesday, 10 January)
- RE: Proposed solution for Issue 4141 (Wednesday, 10 January)
- RE: Proposed solution for Issue 4141 (Tuesday, 9 January)
Bob Freund
Charlton Barreto
Christopher B Ferris
- policy scenarios and test cases (Monday, 22 January)
- Re: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored (Monday, 22 January)
- resolution to 4238 and 4196 (Thursday, 18 January)
- ROUGH outkine of steps with suggested dates (Wednesday, 17 January)
- Re: [NEW ISSUE] 4103 Questionable use of Contoso Ltd in Primer (Wednesday, 17 January)
- action 173 issue 4045 scoping of wsdl1.1 identifiers (Wednesday, 17 January)
- Agenda: WS-Policy WG F2F 24 - 2007-01-16 to 2007-01-18 (Wednesday, 17 January)
- Re: Issues omitted from f2f agenda (Wednesday, 17 January)
- Re: [NEW ISSUE] 4235 clarification needed to sect 4.3 to indicate that the normalization algorithm can be applied to wsp:Policy element used as XML element policy attachment (Wednesday, 17 January)
- [NEW ISSUE] 4238 framework spec does not formally define syntax (outline, etc) for compact form policy expression (Wednesday, 17 January)
- resolutions to 4204 and 4207 (Wednesday, 17 January)
- Issues omitted from f2f agenda (Tuesday, 16 January)
- Re: WS-Addressing comments relating to WS-Policy LC (Tuesday, 16 January)
- [NEW ISSUE] 4235 clarification needed to sect 4.3 to indicate that the normalization algorithm can be applied to wsp:Policy element used as XML element policy attachment (Tuesday, 16 January)
- RE: NEW ISSUE 4138: Normalization Algorithm is broken (Tuesday, 16 January)
- Re: [NEW ISSUE]: LC Comments from SAWSDL WG (Tuesday, 16 January)
- [NEW ISSUE] 4230 normative text masquerading as non-normative guidance (Attachment) (Tuesday, 16 January)
- Agenda: WS-Policy WG F2F 24 - 2007-01-16 to 2007-01-18 (Monday, 15 January)
- Re: Solution space for Issue 4127: Proposed WSDL 1.1 element identifiers can not deal with operation name overloading (Monday, 15 January)
- [NEW ISSUE]: 4207 misleading text in sect 2.2 (Attachments) (Friday, 12 January)
- [NEW ISSUE]: 4205 editorial nits WS-Policy 1.5 - Framework (Friday, 12 January)
- [NEW ISSUE]: 4204 misleading text in sect 2.3 (Framework) (Friday, 12 January)
- [NEW ISSUE]: 4203 Introduction misleading (Framework) (Friday, 12 January)
- Re: [V.Next] 4179 Preferences for policy expressions (Wednesday, 10 January)
- Re: [V.Next] 4178 Declaration of policy domains in policy expressions (Wednesday, 10 January)
- RE: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored (Tuesday, 9 January)
- RE: Issue 4128 -- Action Item Dan Roth, Ashok Malhotra (Thursday, 4 January)
- [VER3] Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 22 - 2007-01-03 (Wednesday, 3 January)
- RE: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored (Tuesday, 2 January)
- [VER2] Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 22 - 2007-01-03 (Tuesday, 2 January)
- Re: [NEW ISSUE] 4103 Questionable use of Contoso Ltd in Primer (Tuesday, 2 January)
Daniel Roth
- RE: NEW ISSUE: 3986 [Guidelines] Parameter vs. Nested Policy Decision at Domain Level? (Thursday, 18 January)
- RE: Initial proposal for Issue 4041 (Thursday, 18 January)
- RE: Editorial issues in the Attachment spec (Thursday, 18 January)
- RE: NEW ISSUE 4206: Clarify treatment of policy assertion parameters in compatibility determination (Wednesday, 17 January)
- RE: ACTION-152 Review 4.4.8 with respect to the addition of the ignorable attribute (Wednesday, 17 January)
- RE: NEW ISSUE 4206: Clarify treatment of policy assertion parameters in compatibility determination (Monday, 15 January)
- RE: NEW ISSUE 4224: [Framework] Section 4, last paragraph content is too restrictive - policy element information items are processed in multiple contexts (Monday, 15 January)
- NEW ISSUE 4224: [Framewokrk] Section 4, last paragraph content is too restrictive - policy element information items are processed in multiple contexts (Monday, 15 January)
- Editorial issues in the Attachment spec (Sunday, 14 January)
- Editorial issues in the Framework spec (Sunday, 14 January)
- RE: [UPDATE] 4196 Minor Updates to Issue and Proposal (Sunday, 14 January)
- RE: ws-policy 12/20/2006: Updated Issue and Proposal - Issue 4069 (Tuesday, 2 January)
David Orchard
Fabian Ritzmann
- Re: [Guidelines] NEW ISSUE 4198: Policy assertion semantics independent of attachment mechanism (Tuesday, 16 January)
- Re: NEW ISSUE 4206: Clarify treatment of policy assertion parameters in compatibility determination (Tuesday, 16 January)
- Re: Agenda: WS-Policy WG F2F 24 - 2007-01-16 to 2007-01-18 (Tuesday, 16 January)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: 4142 Contradictory recommendation for nesting and intersection (Monday, 15 January)
- NEW ISSUE 4206: Clarify treatment of policy assertion parameters in compatibility determination (Friday, 12 January)
- [Guidelines] NEW ISSUE 4198: Policy assertion semantics independent of attachment mechanism (Friday, 12 January)
- Re: [V.Next] 4178 Declaration of policy domains in policy expressions (Wednesday, 10 January)
- Re: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored (Wednesday, 10 January)
- [V.Next] 4179 Preferences for policy expressions (Wednesday, 10 January)
- [V.Next] 4178 Declaration of policy domains in policy expressions (Wednesday, 10 January)
- [NEW ISSUE] 4177 Disambiguate notational convention for choice syntax (Wednesday, 10 January)
- AI 175 done (Tuesday, 2 January)
- NEW ISSUE 4127: Proposed WSDL 1.1 element identifiers can not deal with operation name overloading (Tuesday, 2 January)
- Re: [NEW ISSUE] 4103 Questionable use of Contoso Ltd in Primer (Tuesday, 2 January)
Felix Sasaki
Frederick Hirsch
- [Primer] Proposal to close action 196 (Tuesday, 30 January)
- NEW ISSUE (4263) [Primer] Inform domain specific processing of ignorability of assertions (Thursday, 18 January)
- Re: Initial proposal for Issue 4041 (Tuesday, 16 January)
- Re: [NEW ISSUE]: LC Comments from SAWSDL WG (Monday, 15 January)
- Re: Suggested Feedback to WS-Policy (Monday, 15 January)
- Re: Initial proposal for Issue 4041 (Monday, 15 January)
- Re: NEW ISSUE 4206: Clarify treatment of policy assertion parameters in compatibility determination (Monday, 15 January)
- Re: Initial proposal for Issue 4041 (Thursday, 11 January)
- Initial proposal for Issue 4041 (Wednesday, 10 January)
- Re: Updated Policy Drafts (Wednesday, 10 January)
- Updated Policy Drafts (Tuesday, 9 January)
- Re: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored (Tuesday, 9 January)
Henry, William
Joel Farrell
Mark Little
Maryann Hondo
Monica J. Martin
- [NEW ISSUE] Primer: Absence of Policy Assertions (editorial) [Issue 4288] (Tuesday, 30 January)
- ...[GUIDELINES] Use of @wsp:optional and @wsp:Ignorable on an assertion (Issue (Tuesday, 30 January)
- [UPDATE] Issue 4206 - Updated Framework Proposal Only (Wednesday, 17 January)
- [UPDATE] Issue 4206 - Updated Framework Proposal Only (Wednesday, 17 January)
- [UPDATE] 4196 Minor Updates to Issue and Proposal (Friday, 12 January)
- [NEW ISSUE] 4197 LC Inconsistency on treatment of unknown extensibility elements (Framework, Primer, Guidelines) (Friday, 12 January)
- [NEW ISSUE]: 4196 Clarify namespace restrictions (Framework and Primer) (Friday, 12 January)
- [NEW ISSUE] 4150 Duplicate text exists in Section 3 and 3.2, PolicyAttachment (Friday, 5 January)
- IRC Channel is down. (Wednesday, 3 January)
Paul Cotton
- Agenda: WS-Policy WG telcon 25 - 2007-01-31 (Monday, 29 January)
- RE: WS-Addressing comments relating to WS-Policy LC (Monday, 22 January)
- Candidate Recommendation schedule and exit criteria (Wednesday, 17 January)
- FW: Last Call for C14N 1.1 (Tuesday, 16 January)
- FW: WSDL WG interest in WS-Policy issues (Saturday, 13 January)
- [Bug 4211] WSDL WG Editorial comments on Attachment (Saturday, 13 January)
- [Bug 4210] WSDL WG Editorial comments on Framework (Saturday, 13 January)
- RE: Last Call for C14N 1.1 (and updated WG notes) (Wednesday, 10 January)
- Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 23 - 2007-01-10 (Saturday, 6 January)
- [DRAFT] Agenda: WS-Policy WG F2F 24 - 2007-01-16 to 2007-01-18 (Saturday, 6 January)
Philippe Le Hegaret
Prasad Yendluri
- RE: NEW ISSUE: [GUIDELINES] Use of @wsp:optional and @wsp:Ignorab le o n the same assertion (Monday, 29 January)
- RE: policy scenarios and test cases (Monday, 22 January)
- I volunteer for the UDDI scenario / test case definition work (Friday, 19 January)
- RE: NEW ISSUE: [GUIDELINES] Use of @wsp:optional and @wsp:Ignorab le o n the same assertion (Thursday, 18 January)
- NEW ISSUE: [GUIDELINES] Use of @wsp:optional and @wsp:Ignorable o n the same assertion (Thursday, 18 January)
- RE: [NEW ISSUE] How to ignore some "ignorable" assertions only? (Friday, 12 January)
- RE: Initial proposal for Issue 4041 (Thursday, 11 January)
- RE: Initial proposal for Issue 4041 (Thursday, 11 January)
- RE: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored (Wednesday, 10 January)
- NEW Issue: How to ignore some "ignorable" assertions only? (Wednesday, 10 January)
- RE: Proposed solution for Issue 4141 (Tuesday, 9 January)
- RE: Proposed solution for Issue 4141 (Friday, 5 January)
Rajesh Koilpillai
Sanka Samaranyake
Sergey Beryozkin
- Re: NEW ISSUE: [GUIDELINES] Use of @wsp:optional and @wsp:Ignorab le o n the same assertion (Monday, 29 January)
- Re: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored (Wednesday, 24 January)
- Re: [WS Policy Working Group Jan 2007 f2f day 2 2007-01-17] minutes (DRAFT) (Friday, 19 January)
- Re: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored (Friday, 19 January)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Contradictory recommendation for nesting and intersection (Wednesday, 10 January)
- Re: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored (Tuesday, 9 January)
- Re: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored (Tuesday, 9 January)
- Re: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored (Tuesday, 9 January)
- Re: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored (Tuesday, 9 January)
- Re: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored (Monday, 8 January)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Contradictory recommendation for nesting and intersection (Wednesday, 3 January)
- Re: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored (Tuesday, 2 January)
Sverdlov, Yakov
Tom Rutt
Toufic Boubez
William Henry
Yalcinalp, Umit
- RE: NEW ISSUE (4072): [Guidance] Statements not relevant to assertion design (Wednesday, 31 January)
- RE: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored (Monday, 22 January)
- RE: [Bug 4235] clarification needed to sect 4.3 to indicate that the normalization algorithm can be applied to wsp:Policy element used as XML element policy attachment (Wednesday, 17 January)
- RE: NEW ISSUE 4138: Normalization Algorithm is broken (Tuesday, 16 January)
- RE: NEW ISSUE 4206: Clarify treatment of policy assertion parameters in compatibility determination (Tuesday, 16 January)
- RE: NEW ISSUE 4138: Normalization Algorithm is broken (Monday, 15 January)
- RE: NEW ISSUE 4209: Example 3.1 does not follow the algorithm/definition in merging policies (Monday, 15 January)
- RE: NEW ISSUE: 4142 Contradictory recommendation for nesting and intersection (Monday, 15 January)
- Use of empty policy for nesting should be exemplified (Saturday, 13 January)
- NEW ISSUE: Example 3.1 does not follow the algorithm/definition in merging policies (Friday, 12 January)
- RE: [NEW ISSUE] 4177 Disambiguate notational convention for choice syntax (Friday, 12 January)
- RE: NEW ISSUE 4206: Clarify treatment of policy assertion parameters in compatibility determination (Friday, 12 January)
- RE: NEW ISSUE: Contradictory recommendation for nesting and intersection (Wednesday, 10 January)
- RE: Proposed solution for Issue 4141 (Tuesday, 9 January)
- RE: Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 23 - 2007-01-10 (Monday, 8 January)
- Proposed solution for Issue 4141 (Friday, 5 January)
- NEW ISSUE: Contradictory recommendation for nesting and intersection (Wednesday, 3 January)
- NEW ISSUE: Policy parameter definition is not accurate (Wednesday, 3 January)
- NEW ISSUE: Normalization Algorithm is broken (Tuesday, 2 January)
Last message date: Wednesday, 31 January 2007 00:31:22 UTC