public-ws-policy@w3.org from January 2007 by author

Amelia A Lewis

• Re: Comment on Fragment Identifiers (Wednesday, 3 January)

Anish Karmarkar

• Re: WS-Addressing comments relating to WS-Policy LC (Friday, 19 January)

Anthony Nadalin

• RE: NEW ISSUE 4206: Clarify treatment of policy assertion parameters in compatibility determination (Monday, 15 January)
• RE: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: Contradictory recommendation for nesting and intersection (Tuesday, 9 January)
• Re: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored (Monday, 8 January)

Ashok Malhotra

• RE: NEW ISSUE 4251 - Change syntax of some WSDL 1.1 identifiers (Thursday, 18 January)
• NEW ISSUE 4251 - Change syntax of some WSDL 1.1 identifiers (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Suggested Feedback to WS-Policy (Thursday, 11 January)
• RE: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored (Tuesday, 9 January)
• RE: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored (Tuesday, 9 January)
• RE: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored (Sunday, 7 January)
• RE: Issue 4128 -- Action Item Dan Roth, Ashok Malhotra (Thursday, 4 January)
• RE: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored (Tuesday, 2 January)
• NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored (Tuesday, 2 January)
• NEW ISSUE 4129: Attaching Policies to EPRs (Tuesday, 2 January)
• NEW ISSUE 4128: Add References to WSDL 1.1 and WSDL 2.0 Component Syntax (Tuesday, 2 January)

Asir Vedamuthu

• RE: Bug 4270: Primer versioning example (Wednesday, 31 January)
• RE: NEW ISSUE (4072): [Guidance] Statements not relevant to assertion design (Wednesday, 31 January)
• RE: Issue 3953 [Guidelines] Update to issue on domain interactions and assertion nesting (Tuesday, 30 January)
• RE: NEW ISSUE (4263) [Primer] Inform domain specific processing of ignorability of assertions (Tuesday, 30 January)
• RE: Candidate CR Drafts (Thursday, 25 January)
• Candidate CR Drafts (Thursday, 25 January)
• RE: policy scenarios and test cases (Tuesday, 23 January)
• Proposed Resolutions to 4238 and 4196 (Thursday, 18 January)
• RE: [Bug 4235] clarification needed to sect 4.3 to indicate that the normalization algorithm can be applied to wsp:Policy element used as XML element policy attachment (Wednesday, 17 January)
• FW: [Bug 4240] Title: The distribution example does not follow the axioms in Section 4.3.3 (Wednesday, 17 January)
• RE: [Bug 4235] clarification needed to sect 4.3 to indicate that the normalization algorithm can be applied to wsp:Policy element used as XML element policy attachment (Wednesday, 17 January)
• RE: NEW ISSUE 4138: Normalization Algorithm is broken (Wednesday, 17 January)
• WS-Policy Features and Interop Scenarios (Tuesday, 16 January)
• RE: NEW ISSUE 4138: Normalization Algorithm is broken (Tuesday, 16 January)
• RE: NEW Issue 4195: How to ignore some "ignorable" assertions only? (Tuesday, 16 January)
• RE: proposal for ACTION 181 (Tuesday, 16 January)
• RE: [NEW ISSUE] 4230 normative text masquerading as non-normative guidance (Attachment) (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Issue 4225 (was RE: Editorial issues in the Framework spec (Monday, 15 January)
• Issue 4226 (was RE: Editorial issues in the Attachment spec (Monday, 15 January)
• RE: NEW ISSUE 4209: Example 3.1 does not follow the algorithm/definition in merging policies (Monday, 15 January)
• RE: NEW ISSUE 4138: Normalization Algorithm is broken (Monday, 15 January)
• RE: [NEW ISSUE]: 4204 misleading text in sect 2.3 (Framework) (Sunday, 14 January)
• RE: [Bug 4211] WSDL WG Editorial comments on Attachment (Sunday, 14 January)
• RE: [Bug 4210] WSDL WG Editorial comments on Framework (Sunday, 14 January)
• RE: [NEW ISSUE]: LC Comments from SAWSDL WG (Sunday, 14 January)
• RE: NEW Issue: How to ignore some "ignorable" assertions only? (Sunday, 14 January)
• RE: NEW ISSUE 4209: Example 3.1 does not follow the algorithm/definition in merging policies (Saturday, 13 January)
• RE: NEW ISSUE: 4142 Contradictory recommendation for nesting and intersection (Saturday, 13 January)
• RE: [NEW ISSUE]: 4203 Introduction misleading (Framework) (Saturday, 13 January)
• RE: [NEW ISSUE]: 4207 misleading text in sect 2.2 (Attachments) (Saturday, 13 January)
• RE: [NEW ISSUE]: 4205 editorial nits WS-Policy 1.5 - Framework (Saturday, 13 January)
• RE: [NEW ISSUE] 4177 Disambiguate notational convention for choice syntax (Friday, 12 January)
• RE: [NEW ISSUE] 4197 LC Inconsistency on treatment of unknown extensibility elements (Framework, Primer, Guidelines) (Friday, 12 January)
• RE: [NEW ISSUE] 4150 Duplicate text exists in Section 3 and 3.2, PolicyAttachment (Wednesday, 10 January)
• RE: Proposed solution for Issue 4141 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• RE: Proposed solution for Issue 4141 (Tuesday, 9 January)

Bob Freund

• WS-Addressing comments relating to WS-Policy LC (Tuesday, 9 January)

Charlton Barreto

• Re: [Bug 4211] WSDL WG Editorial comments on Attachment (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: [Bug 4210] WSDL WG Editorial comments on Framework (Tuesday, 16 January)

Christopher B Ferris

• policy scenarios and test cases (Monday, 22 January)
• Re: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored (Monday, 22 January)
• resolution to 4238 and 4196 (Thursday, 18 January)
• ROUGH outkine of steps with suggested dates (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: [NEW ISSUE] 4103 Questionable use of Contoso Ltd in Primer (Wednesday, 17 January)
• action 173 issue 4045 scoping of wsdl1.1 identifiers (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Agenda: WS-Policy WG F2F 24 - 2007-01-16 to 2007-01-18 (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Issues omitted from f2f agenda (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: [NEW ISSUE] 4235 clarification needed to sect 4.3 to indicate that the normalization algorithm can be applied to wsp:Policy element used as XML element policy attachment (Wednesday, 17 January)
• [NEW ISSUE] 4238 framework spec does not formally define syntax (outline, etc) for compact form policy expression (Wednesday, 17 January)
• resolutions to 4204 and 4207 (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Issues omitted from f2f agenda (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: WS-Addressing comments relating to WS-Policy LC (Tuesday, 16 January)
• [NEW ISSUE] 4235 clarification needed to sect 4.3 to indicate that the normalization algorithm can be applied to wsp:Policy element used as XML element policy attachment (Tuesday, 16 January)
• RE: NEW ISSUE 4138: Normalization Algorithm is broken (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: [NEW ISSUE]: LC Comments from SAWSDL WG (Tuesday, 16 January)
• [NEW ISSUE] 4230 normative text masquerading as non-normative guidance (Attachment) (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Agenda: WS-Policy WG F2F 24 - 2007-01-16 to 2007-01-18 (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: Solution space for Issue 4127: Proposed WSDL 1.1 element identifiers can not deal with operation name overloading (Monday, 15 January)
• [NEW ISSUE]: 4207 misleading text in sect 2.2 (Attachments) (Friday, 12 January)
• [NEW ISSUE]: 4205 editorial nits WS-Policy 1.5 - Framework (Friday, 12 January)
• [NEW ISSUE]: 4204 misleading text in sect 2.3 (Framework) (Friday, 12 January)
• [NEW ISSUE]: 4203 Introduction misleading (Framework) (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: [V.Next] 4179 Preferences for policy expressions (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: [V.Next] 4178 Declaration of policy domains in policy expressions (Wednesday, 10 January)
• RE: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored (Tuesday, 9 January)
• RE: Issue 4128 -- Action Item Dan Roth, Ashok Malhotra (Thursday, 4 January)
• [VER3] Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 22 - 2007-01-03 (Wednesday, 3 January)
• RE: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored (Tuesday, 2 January)
• [VER2] Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 22 - 2007-01-03 (Tuesday, 2 January)
• Re: [NEW ISSUE] 4103 Questionable use of Contoso Ltd in Primer (Tuesday, 2 January)

Daniel Roth

• RE: NEW ISSUE: 3986 [Guidelines] Parameter vs. Nested Policy Decision at Domain Level? (Thursday, 18 January)
• RE: Initial proposal for Issue 4041 (Thursday, 18 January)
• RE: Editorial issues in the Attachment spec (Thursday, 18 January)
• RE: NEW ISSUE 4206: Clarify treatment of policy assertion parameters in compatibility determination (Wednesday, 17 January)
• RE: ACTION-152 Review 4.4.8 with respect to the addition of the ignorable attribute (Wednesday, 17 January)
• RE: NEW ISSUE 4206: Clarify treatment of policy assertion parameters in compatibility determination (Monday, 15 January)
• RE: NEW ISSUE 4224: [Framework] Section 4, last paragraph content is too restrictive - policy element information items are processed in multiple contexts (Monday, 15 January)
• NEW ISSUE 4224: [Framewokrk] Section 4, last paragraph content is too restrictive - policy element information items are processed in multiple contexts (Monday, 15 January)
• Editorial issues in the Attachment spec (Sunday, 14 January)
• Editorial issues in the Framework spec (Sunday, 14 January)
• RE: [UPDATE] 4196 Minor Updates to Issue and Proposal (Sunday, 14 January)
• RE: ws-policy 12/20/2006: Updated Issue and Proposal - Issue 4069 (Tuesday, 2 January)

David Orchard

• Bug 4270: Primer versioning example (Tuesday, 23 January)
• RE: NEW ISSUE 4251 - Change syntax of some WSDL 1.1 identifiers (Thursday, 18 January)
• RE: Solution space for Issue 4127: Proposed WSDL 1.1 element identifiers can not deal with operation name overloading (Wednesday, 17 January)
• ACTION-174: See what XPointer are in line with WSDL and syntax (Friday, 12 January)
• Bug 4208: identifiers should use WSDL 1.1 element names not WSDL 2.0 component names (Friday, 12 January)
• Solution space for Issue 4127: Proposed WSDL 1.1 element identifiers can not deal with operation name overloading (Friday, 12 January)
• RE: NEW ISSUE 4127: Proposed WSDL 1.1 element identifiers can not deal with operation name overloading (Wednesday, 10 January)

Fabian Ritzmann

• Re: [Guidelines] NEW ISSUE 4198: Policy assertion semantics independent of attachment mechanism (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: NEW ISSUE 4206: Clarify treatment of policy assertion parameters in compatibility determination (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: Agenda: WS-Policy WG F2F 24 - 2007-01-16 to 2007-01-18 (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: 4142 Contradictory recommendation for nesting and intersection (Monday, 15 January)
• NEW ISSUE 4206: Clarify treatment of policy assertion parameters in compatibility determination (Friday, 12 January)
• [Guidelines] NEW ISSUE 4198: Policy assertion semantics independent of attachment mechanism (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: [V.Next] 4178 Declaration of policy domains in policy expressions (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored (Wednesday, 10 January)
• [V.Next] 4179 Preferences for policy expressions (Wednesday, 10 January)
• [V.Next] 4178 Declaration of policy domains in policy expressions (Wednesday, 10 January)
• [NEW ISSUE] 4177 Disambiguate notational convention for choice syntax (Wednesday, 10 January)
• AI 175 done (Tuesday, 2 January)
• NEW ISSUE 4127: Proposed WSDL 1.1 element identifiers can not deal with operation name overloading (Tuesday, 2 January)
• Re: [NEW ISSUE] 4103 Questionable use of Contoso Ltd in Primer (Tuesday, 2 January)

Felix Sasaki

• Re: [NEW ISSUE] 4103 Questionable use of Contoso Ltd in Primer (Wednesday, 24 January)
• Re: New ISSUE 4254: Ownership of WSP namespace (Thursday, 18 January)
• New ISSUE 4254: Ownership of WSP namespace (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: LC Comments from SAWSDL WG (WS Policy issue 4188) (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: [NEW ISSUE]: 4207 misleading text in sect 2.2 (Attachments) (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: [NEW ISSUE]: 4196 Clarify namespace restrictions (Framework and Primer) (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: [NEW ISSUE] 4103 Questionable use of Contoso Ltd in Primer (Friday, 12 January)
• [NEW ISSUE]: LC Comments from SAWSDL WG (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: [NEW ISSUE] 4103 Questionable use of Contoso Ltd in Primer (Tuesday, 9 January)

Frederick Hirsch

• [Primer] Proposal to close action 196 (Tuesday, 30 January)
• NEW ISSUE (4263) [Primer] Inform domain specific processing of ignorability of assertions (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: Initial proposal for Issue 4041 (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: [NEW ISSUE]: LC Comments from SAWSDL WG (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: Suggested Feedback to WS-Policy (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: Initial proposal for Issue 4041 (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: NEW ISSUE 4206: Clarify treatment of policy assertion parameters in compatibility determination (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: Initial proposal for Issue 4041 (Thursday, 11 January)
• Initial proposal for Issue 4041 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: Updated Policy Drafts (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Updated Policy Drafts (Tuesday, 9 January)
• Re: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored (Tuesday, 9 January)

Henry, William

• Re: NEW ISSUE: [GUIDELINES] Use of @wsp:optional and @wsp:Ignorable o n the same assertion (Thursday, 18 January)

Joel Farrell

• Re: LC Comments from SAWSDL WG (WS Policy issue 4188) (Tuesday, 23 January)

Mark Little

• Re: [VER2] Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 22 - 2007-01-03 (Wednesday, 3 January)

Maryann Hondo

• RE: [NEW ISSUE]: LC Comments from SAWSDL WG (Tuesday, 16 January)
• proposal for ACTION 181 (Tuesday, 16 January)

Monica J. Martin

• [NEW ISSUE] Primer: Absence of Policy Assertions (editorial) [Issue 4288] (Tuesday, 30 January)
• ...[GUIDELINES] Use of @wsp:optional and @wsp:Ignorable on an assertion (Issue (Tuesday, 30 January)
• [UPDATE] Issue 4206 - Updated Framework Proposal Only (Wednesday, 17 January)
• [UPDATE] Issue 4206 - Updated Framework Proposal Only (Wednesday, 17 January)
• [UPDATE] 4196 Minor Updates to Issue and Proposal (Friday, 12 January)
• [NEW ISSUE] 4197 LC Inconsistency on treatment of unknown extensibility elements (Framework, Primer, Guidelines) (Friday, 12 January)
• [NEW ISSUE]: 4196 Clarify namespace restrictions (Framework and Primer) (Friday, 12 January)
• [NEW ISSUE] 4150 Duplicate text exists in Section 3 and 3.2, PolicyAttachment (Friday, 5 January)
• IRC Channel is down. (Wednesday, 3 January)

Paul Cotton

• Agenda: WS-Policy WG telcon 25 - 2007-01-31 (Monday, 29 January)
• RE: WS-Addressing comments relating to WS-Policy LC (Monday, 22 January)
• Candidate Recommendation schedule and exit criteria (Wednesday, 17 January)
• FW: Last Call for C14N 1.1 (Tuesday, 16 January)
• FW: WSDL WG interest in WS-Policy issues (Saturday, 13 January)
• [Bug 4211] WSDL WG Editorial comments on Attachment (Saturday, 13 January)
• [Bug 4210] WSDL WG Editorial comments on Framework (Saturday, 13 January)
• RE: Last Call for C14N 1.1 (and updated WG notes) (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 23 - 2007-01-10 (Saturday, 6 January)
• [DRAFT] Agenda: WS-Policy WG F2F 24 - 2007-01-16 to 2007-01-18 (Saturday, 6 January)

Philippe Le Hegaret

• Re: [NEW ISSUE] 4103 Questionable use of Contoso Ltd in Primer (Friday, 5 January)

Prasad Yendluri

• RE: NEW ISSUE: [GUIDELINES] Use of @wsp:optional and @wsp:Ignorab le o n the same assertion (Monday, 29 January)
• RE: policy scenarios and test cases (Monday, 22 January)
• I volunteer for the UDDI scenario / test case definition work (Friday, 19 January)
• RE: NEW ISSUE: [GUIDELINES] Use of @wsp:optional and @wsp:Ignorab le o n the same assertion (Thursday, 18 January)
• NEW ISSUE: [GUIDELINES] Use of @wsp:optional and @wsp:Ignorable o n the same assertion (Thursday, 18 January)
• RE: [NEW ISSUE] How to ignore some "ignorable" assertions only? (Friday, 12 January)
• RE: Initial proposal for Issue 4041 (Thursday, 11 January)
• RE: Initial proposal for Issue 4041 (Thursday, 11 January)
• RE: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored (Wednesday, 10 January)
• NEW Issue: How to ignore some "ignorable" assertions only? (Wednesday, 10 January)
• RE: Proposed solution for Issue 4141 (Tuesday, 9 January)
• RE: Proposed solution for Issue 4141 (Friday, 5 January)

Rajesh Koilpillai

• Re: I volunteer for the UDDI scenario / test case definition work (Friday, 19 January)

Sanka Samaranyake

• Re: IRC Channel is down. (Wednesday, 3 January)

Sergey Beryozkin

• Re: NEW ISSUE: [GUIDELINES] Use of @wsp:optional and @wsp:Ignorab le o n the same assertion (Monday, 29 January)
• Re: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored (Wednesday, 24 January)
• Re: [WS Policy Working Group Jan 2007 f2f day 2 2007-01-17] minutes (DRAFT) (Friday, 19 January)
• Re: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored (Friday, 19 January)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: Contradictory recommendation for nesting and intersection (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored (Tuesday, 9 January)
• Re: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored (Tuesday, 9 January)
• Re: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored (Tuesday, 9 January)
• Re: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored (Tuesday, 9 January)
• Re: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored (Monday, 8 January)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: Contradictory recommendation for nesting and intersection (Wednesday, 3 January)
• Re: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored (Tuesday, 2 January)

Sverdlov, Yakov

• RE: Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 23 - 2007-01-10 (Wednesday, 10 January)

Tom Rutt

• Re: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored (Tuesday, 9 January)
• Re: Concrete Proposal Around 3619 (Monday, 8 January)
• Re: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored (Monday, 8 January)
• Re: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored (Monday, 8 January)

Toufic Boubez

• RE: [VER2] Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 22 - 2007-01-03 (Wednesday, 3 January)

William Henry

• Re: [NEW ISSUE] 4103 Questionable use of Contoso Ltd in Primer (Thursday, 18 January)
• [NEW ISSUE] 4255 [Primer] Section 2.9 should also explain basic attaching (Thursday, 18 January)
• [NEW ISSUE] 4253 [Primer] Basic Concepts section on Policy does not explain usage reasonably (Wednesday, 17 January)

Yalcinalp, Umit

• RE: NEW ISSUE (4072): [Guidance] Statements not relevant to assertion design (Wednesday, 31 January)
• RE: NEW ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertions must be ignored (Monday, 22 January)
• RE: [Bug 4235] clarification needed to sect 4.3 to indicate that the normalization algorithm can be applied to wsp:Policy element used as XML element policy attachment (Wednesday, 17 January)
• RE: NEW ISSUE 4138: Normalization Algorithm is broken (Tuesday, 16 January)
• RE: NEW ISSUE 4206: Clarify treatment of policy assertion parameters in compatibility determination (Tuesday, 16 January)
• RE: NEW ISSUE 4138: Normalization Algorithm is broken (Monday, 15 January)
• RE: NEW ISSUE 4209: Example 3.1 does not follow the algorithm/definition in merging policies (Monday, 15 January)
• RE: NEW ISSUE: 4142 Contradictory recommendation for nesting and intersection (Monday, 15 January)
• Use of empty policy for nesting should be exemplified (Saturday, 13 January)
• NEW ISSUE: Example 3.1 does not follow the algorithm/definition in merging policies (Friday, 12 January)
• RE: [NEW ISSUE] 4177 Disambiguate notational convention for choice syntax (Friday, 12 January)
• RE: NEW ISSUE 4206: Clarify treatment of policy assertion parameters in compatibility determination (Friday, 12 January)
• RE: NEW ISSUE: Contradictory recommendation for nesting and intersection (Wednesday, 10 January)
• RE: Proposed solution for Issue 4141 (Tuesday, 9 January)
• RE: Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 23 - 2007-01-10 (Monday, 8 January)
• Proposed solution for Issue 4141 (Friday, 5 January)
• NEW ISSUE: Contradictory recommendation for nesting and intersection (Wednesday, 3 January)
• NEW ISSUE: Policy parameter definition is not accurate (Wednesday, 3 January)
• NEW ISSUE: Normalization Algorithm is broken (Tuesday, 2 January)

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 January 2007 00:31:22 UTC