- From: Prasad Yendluri <prasad.yendluri@webmethods.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 17:23:33 -0500
- To: "Henry, William" <William.Henry@iona.com>, Prasad Yendluri <prasad.yendluri@webmethods.com>, public-ws-policy@w3.org
- Message-ID: <BDD4EF3331E8FB4EA19B677CDAD63020B503FB@ca-exbe1.webm.webmethods.com>
wsp:Optional is just a syntactic sugar, for two alternatives one with the assertion and one without. If an assertion say "A" also had wsp:Ignorable=true, then one alternative would have the assertion A with @wsp:Ignorable=true and other where the assertion A would not be present. This is what we discussed at the Burlington f2f IIRC. What is the use case that would preclude the use of both on the same assertion? If we find one, then this issue becomes a LC issue on the Framework document. Regards, Prasad _____ From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-policy-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Henry, William Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 2:14 PM To: prasad.yendluri@webMethods.com; public-ws-policy@w3.org Subject: Re: NEW ISSUE: [GUIDELINES] Use of @wsp:optional and @wsp:Ignorable o n the same assertion Is this really the case? I'm not sure the intent was ever to have both these in that same assertion. Was it? I'd have thought the guidelines should have shown that these were for two different types of use case. Can some explain the use case that was dreamed up where the make sense together? William William Henry Enterprise Architect, Director IONA Technologies Inc. william.henry@iona.com -----Original Message----- From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org <public-ws-policy-request@w3.org> To: public-ws-policy@w3.org <public-ws-policy@w3.org> Sent: Thu Jan 18 17:05:29 2007 Subject: NEW ISSUE: [GUIDELINES] Use of @wsp:optional and @wsp:Ignorable o n the same assertion http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4262 <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4262> Title: Provide clear guidance on the specification of @wsp:optional=true and @wsp:Ignorable=true on the same assertion Target: Guidelines Document Description: The framework specification does not explicitly state if an assertion can be marked both optional and ignorable. However, as we discussed since @wsp:optional is just a syntactic simplification, it is permitted to mark an assertion with both the @wsp:optional and @wsp:Ignorable with the value of "true" for both. I ask that the guidelines document add some guidance to clarify this aspect. Justification: No clarify in this aspect anywhere else Proposal: Add a text to the guidelines document to clarify that both the attributes wsp:optional and wsp:Ignorable with the value of "true" for both, can be specified on the same assertion Regards, Prasad
Received on Thursday, 18 January 2007 22:23:42 UTC