- From: Maryann Hondo <mhondo@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 21:49:30 -0500
- To: Asir Vedamuthu <asirveda@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>, public-ws-policy@w3.org, public-ws-policy-request@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF181AFAA4.78CE498E-ON85257265.000F75D4-85257265.000F8498@us.ibm.com>
+1 Maryann Asir Vedamuthu <asirveda@microsoft.com> Sent by: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org 01/14/2007 01:50 AM To Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>, <public-ws-policy@w3.org> cc Subject RE: [NEW ISSUE]: LC Comments from SAWSDL WG >Policy Assertions on interfaces, (or WSDL 1.1 portTypes), operations >and messages (the abstract WSDL descriptions) SHOULD NOT describe the >formal semantics of messages or the action performed by the operations. This is a guideline for the assertion authors. Section 4.3.3 'Self Describing Messages' in the Guidelines document makes a similar general point: 'Policy assertions should not be used express the semantics of a message' [1]. We agree that assertion authors should not define policy assertions to represent information that is necessary to understand a message. The Guidelines document is the natural residence for such materials. The suggested guideline cannot be enforced by the attachment draft. We suggest marking this issue as a Guidelines document issue. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-ws-policy-guidelines-20061221/#self-describ ing Regards, Asir S Vedamuthu Microsoft Corporation -----Original Message----- From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-policy-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Felix Sasaki Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 9:07 AM To: public-ws-policy@w3.org Subject: [NEW ISSUE]: LC Comments from SAWSDL WG See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy-comments/2007Jan/00 00.html and http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4188 . Below is a copy of the text. Felix The SAWSDL Working Group has reviewed the Web Services Policy 1.5 set of specifications and has the following comments. We assume that semantic annotations and policy attachments are orthogonal extensions to WSDL 2.0 (and 1.1) and when combined on the same WSDL component , can be processed and interpreted independently. You should confirm that this is the case. We recommend that the following statement be made in Web Services Policy 1.5 - Attachment to avoid possible future conflicts between SAWSDL and the WS-Policy specifications: Policy Assertions on interfaces, (or WSDL 1.1 portTypes), operations and messages (the abstract WSDL descriptions) SHOULD NOT describe the formal semantics of messages or the action performed by the operations. Regards, Joel
Received on Tuesday, 16 January 2007 02:49:44 UTC