W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-policy@w3.org > January 2007

Re: LC Comments from SAWSDL WG (WS Policy issue 4188)

From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 07:15:42 +0900
Message-ID: <45AD4E8E.5000308@w3.org>
To: Joel Farrell <joelf@us.ibm.com>
Cc: public-ws-policy-comments@w3.org, SAWSDL public list <public-ws-semann@w3.org>, "public-ws-policy@w3.org" <public-ws-policy@w3.org>

Hello Joel,

Thank you for your comment. The WS Policy WG has is tracking this issue
as http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4188 .

We discussed it at http://www.w3.org/2007/01/16-ws-policy-irc#T22-07-41
. Our resolution is that we agree with your sentiment. We will add a
reference to SAWSDL not in the attachment document [1], but in the
guidelines document [2], and make explicit in that document that there
is no overlap between SAWSDL and WS Policy. See also the discussion
thread at [3].

[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Jan/0111.html

Regards, Felix.

discussed Joel Farrell wrote:
> The SAWSDL Working Group has reviewed the Web Services Policy 1.5 set of
> specifications and has the following comments.
> We assume that semantic annotations and policy attachments are
> orthogonal extensions to WSDL 2.0 (and 1.1) and when combined on the
> same WSDL component , can be processed and interpreted independently.
> You should confirm that this is the case.
> We recommend that the following statement be made in Web Services Policy
> 1.5 - Attachment to avoid possible future conflicts between SAWSDL and
> the WS-Policy specifications: Policy Assertions on interfaces, (or WSDL
> 1.1 portTypes), operations and messages (the abstract WSDL descriptions)
> SHOULD NOT describe the formal semantics of messages or the action
> performed by the operations.
> Regards,
> Joel
Received on Tuesday, 16 January 2007 22:16:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:33:23 UTC