Re: Issues omitted from f2f agenda

As a follow-up, all of these issues were discussed today. The first two 
were in the agenda but unadorned with
their corresponding issue ids. The latter two were added after the agenda 
was posted.

Cheers,

Christopher Ferris
STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy
email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/chrisferris
phone: +1 508 377 9295

public-ws-policy-request@w3.org wrote on 01/16/2007 06:23:32 PM:

> 
> [NEW ISSUE] 4188 LC Comments from SAWSDL WG 
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4188 
> [NEW ISSUE] 4195 How to ignore some of the assertions marked ?Ignorable? 

> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4195 
> [NEW ISSUE] 4230 normative text masquerading as non-normative guidance 
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4230 
> [NEW ISSUE] 4235 clarification needed to sect 4.3 to indicate that the 
... 
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4235 
> 
> Cheers, 
> 
> Christopher Ferris
> STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy
> email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
> blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/chrisferris
> phone: +1 508 377 9295