- From: Asir Vedamuthu <asirveda@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 13:02:32 -0800
- To: Daniel Roth <daniel.roth@microsoft.com>, <public-ws-policy@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <1E0F0378382054439F14D5450650478F0BFD7D0F@RED-MSG-42.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
[Added Issue Number to the Subject] From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-policy-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Roth Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2007 10:17 PM To: public-ws-policy@w3.org Subject: Editorial issues in the Framework spec In reviewing the LC draft for the Framework spec we identified the following editorial items: Item 1: Section 4.3.4 - @Digest is not of type xs:boolean Solution: s/xs:boolean/xs:base64Binary Item 2: Section 5.5 - Example does not have namespace prefixes Solution: Prefix Policy elements with the wsp namespace prefix Item 3: Section 4, 1st Paragraph - "policy expression" should be plural Solution: s/policy expression/policy expressions Item 4: Section 4.3.3 - Negative motivation for compact policy expressions Solution: Remove the sentence: "In some instances, complex policies expressed in normal form can get relatively large and hard to manage." Item 5: Section 4, 1st Paragraph - List of sections in the text is inconsistent with latest content and duplicates TOC Solution: Remove the phrase: "namely (i) Normal form of a policy expression (ii) Compact form of a policy expression (iii) Identification of policy expressions and (iv) Policy intersection." We recommend that these items be given to the editorial team Daniel Roth
Received on Monday, 15 January 2007 21:03:19 UTC