+1, let's call this 'Feature 43 - Negative Test Cases'.
Regards,
Asir S Vedamuthu
Microsoft Corporation
From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-ws-policy-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Prasad Yendluri
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 8:34 AM
To: Christopher B Ferris; public-ws-policy@w3.org
Subject: RE: policy scenarios and test cases
+1
Regards,
Prasad
________________________________
From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-ws-policy-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Christopher B
Ferris
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 7:55 AM
To: public-ws-policy@w3.org
Subject: policy scenarios and test cases
All,
It occured to me that we should be adding negative test cases to the set
of scenarios
for ws-policy, building off of the set of test cases in the original
contribution [1]. e.g., we should have
examples of policy documents that include wsp elements or attributes in
the wrong places...
examples of use of extensibility where it may not be allowed, etc.
Just a thought.
[1]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Jun/0010.html
Cheers,
Christopher Ferris
STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy
email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/chrisferris
phone: +1 508 377 9295