[Bug 4211] WSDL WG Editorial comments on Attachment

-----Original Message-----
From: public-ws-policy-qa-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-policy-qa-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Sent: January 12, 2007 6:58 PM
To: public-ws-policy-qa@w3.org
Subject: [Bug 4211] WSDL WG Editorial comments on Attachment


http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4211

           Summary: WSDL WG Editorial comments on Attachment
           Product: WS-Policy
           Version: LC
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: minor
          Priority: P2
         Component: Attachment
        AssignedTo: fsasaki@w3.org
        ReportedBy: jonathan@wso2.com
         QAContact: public-ws-policy-qa@w3.org


8. Effective Policy (3.1)
- The second paragraph is very cumbersome. The first phrase in the first
sentence should be broken out into its own sentence, to read, "When multiple
attachments are made, their relevant policies can be combined."
- The third paragraph has the same problem. The first phrase in the first
sentence should be broken out into its own sentence, to read, "This combination
can be achieved through a merge."

9. XML Element Attachment (3.3)
- Element Information Item should reference its definition in XML Infoset [3].

10. Security Considerations (7)
- Policy attachments "signing" is RECOMMENDED but there is no reference to what
is indicated by "signing" or to any standards work (W3C or other) around any
such signing. Does this refer to WSS signatures [6]? The use of "signing"
itself in this language should reference any such standard(s).

[3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xml-infoset-20040204/#infoitem.document
[6]
http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-soap-message-security-1.0.pdf