Thursday, 29 December 2011
Friday, 23 December 2011
- Re: RfC: test structure and process; deadline January 6
- Re: [widgets] How to divorce widgets-digsig from Elliptic Curve PAG?
Wednesday, 21 December 2011
- Touch Events test assertions
- Re: [widgets] How to divorce widgets-digsig from Elliptic Curve PAG?
- Re: [widgets] How to divorce widgets-digsig from Elliptic Curve PAG?
- [mouselock] Various comments
Tuesday, 20 December 2011
Friday, 16 December 2011
- RfC: test structure and process; deadline Dec 21
- Call for Implementations: Touch Events v1 Candidate Recommendation
Tuesday, 13 December 2011
Monday, 12 December 2011
Wednesday, 7 December 2011
- Re: PFWG comments on Touch Events
- Re: PFWG comments on Touch Events
- Re: PFWG comments on Touch Events
Monday, 5 December 2011
Thursday, 1 December 2011
Wednesday, 30 November 2011
- Re: PFWG comments on Touch Events
- Re: No call November 29; Seeking status of Touch Events PAG
- PFWG comments on Touch Events
Monday, 28 November 2011
Saturday, 26 November 2011
Friday, 25 November 2011
Thursday, 24 November 2011
- Re: PointerLock and Gamepad APIs
- CfC: Add PointerLock and Gamepad APIs to WebApps' charter; deadline December 1
- Re: PointerLock and Gamepad APIs
- Re: PointerLock and Gamepad APIs
- Re: PointerLock and Gamepad APIs
- PointerLock and Gamepad APIs
Tuesday, 22 November 2011
- Draft minutes: 22 November 2011 call
- CfC: publish a Candidate Recommendation of Touch Events v1; deadline December 2
- Re: Draft agenda: 22 November 2011; [Note time changes for EU !]
Monday, 21 November 2011
Thursday, 17 November 2011
- Fwd: Apple disclosed patents for Touch Events specification
- Re: Feedback from PFWG on Touch Events 13 September 2011 draft
Wednesday, 16 November 2011
- Re: Webkit Bug 72010 for Vibration API
- Re: [vibra] Vibration API
- RE: [vibra] Vibration API
- Webkit Bug 72010 for Vibration API
- Re: [vibra] Vibration API
- RE: [vibra] Vibration API
- Apple disclosed patents for Touch Events specification
Tuesday, 15 November 2011
Monday, 14 November 2011
- Re: Rename Mouse Lock to Pointer Lock?
- Rename Mouse Lock to Pointer Lock?
- Re: Missing Touch.target attribute in Touch Events v1 LCWD
- Re: [vibra] Vibration API
- Re: [vibra] Vibration API
- Re: [vibra] Vibration API
- Re: [vibra] Vibration API
Friday, 11 November 2011
- Re: Missing Touch.target attribute in Touch Events v1 LCWD
- Re: Feedback from PFWG on Touch Events 13 September 2011 draft
Thursday, 10 November 2011
- Re: [vibra] Vibration API
- Re: [vibra] Vibration API
- Reminder: RfC: LCWD of Touch Events version 1; deadline November 17
Wednesday, 9 November 2011
Monday, 7 November 2011
- Re: Missing Touch.target attribute in Touch Events v1 LCWD
- Re: ACTION-87: Create a Comment Tracking Doc for Touch Events v1 LC#2 (Web Events Working Group)
- Next call is November 22
Friday, 4 November 2011
- Re: Missing Touch.target attribute in Touch Events v1 LCWD
- Missing Touch.target attribute in Touch Events v1 LCWD
Wednesday, 2 November 2011
- Draft Minutes: 1 November 2011 f2f meeting
- Re: Expand of WG’s Target Input Devic es - related new chater
- Re: Expand of WG’s Target Input Devic es - related new chater
Tuesday, 1 November 2011
- Re: Expand of WG’s Target Input Devic es - related new chater
- Re: Expand of WG’s Target Input Devic es - related new chater
- Re: Mouse Lock feedback
- Re: Expand of WG’s Target Input Devic es - related new chater
Monday, 31 October 2011
Thursday, 27 October 2011
- Re: ACTION-67: Work with Doug on next steps for the Intentional Events spec (Web Events Working Group)
- RfC: LCWD of Touch Events version 1; deadline November 17
- Re: ACTION-67: Work with Doug on next steps for the Intentional Events spec (Web Events Working Group)
- Re: Mouse Lock feedback
- Re: Agenda planning for Nov 1 meeting
- Re: Agenda planning for Nov 1 meeting
Wednesday, 26 October 2011
- MouseLock feedback
- Re: ACTION-67: Work with Doug on next steps for the Intentional Events spec (Web Events Working Group)
- Re: ACTION-67: Work with Doug on next steps for the Intentional Events spec (Web Events Working Group)
- Re: ACTION-67: Work with Doug on next steps for the Intentional Events spec (Web Events Working Group)
Tuesday, 25 October 2011
Monday, 24 October 2011
Saturday, 22 October 2011
Friday, 21 October 2011
- Re: table for each touch event type
- Re: table for each touch event type
- RfC: new Event Types table; deadline Oct 23
- Re: Mouse Lock
- Re: Mouse Lock
Thursday, 20 October 2011
- Re: Mouse Lock
- Re: [gamepad] .gamepads vs. function access
- Re: [gamepad] .gamepads vs. function access
- Re: Mouse Lock
- Mouse Lock
Wednesday, 19 October 2011
Tuesday, 18 October 2011
- [gamepad] .gamepads vs. function access
- Re: Canceled: Draft agenda: 18 October 2011 call
- Canceled: Draft agenda: 18 October 2011 call
- Re: ACTION-67: Work with Doug on next steps for the Intentional Events spec (Web Events Working Group)
- Regrets (Re: Draft agenda: 18 October 2011 call)
- Re: ACTION-59: Follow-up this Khronos Stream Input work (Web Events Working Group)
- Re: ACTION-67: Work with Doug on next steps for the Intentional Events spec (Web Events Working Group)
Monday, 17 October 2011
Friday, 14 October 2011
Thursday, 13 October 2011
Friday, 14 October 2011
- Re: WebEvents-ISSUE-24: Concern about Gamepad name being unclear
- Re: WebEvents-ISSUE-24: Concern about Gamepad name being unclear
Thursday, 13 October 2011
- Re: WebEvents-ISSUE-24: Concern about Gamepad name being unclear
- Re: WebEvents-ISSUE-24: Concern about Gamepad name being unclear
- Re: [vibra] Vibration API
- Re: Should section 7 of the Touch Events specs be marked as non-normative?
- Re: Should section 7 of the Touch Events specs be marked as non-normative?
- Re: Feedback from PFWG on Touch Events 13 September 2011 draft
- Should section 7 of the Touch Events specs be marked as non-normative?
Wednesday, 12 October 2011
- Re: WebEvents-ISSUE-24: Concern about Gamepad name being unclear
- WebEvents-ISSUE-24: Concern about Gamepad name being unclear
- Re: table for each touch event type
Tuesday, 11 October 2011
- Draft minutes: 11 October 2011 call
- Re: Feedback on TouchEvent and DocumentTouch
- Re: [vibra] Vibration API
- Re: Feedback on TouchEvent and DocumentTouch
- Re: [vibra] Vibration API
- [vibra] Vibration API
Monday, 10 October 2011
Friday, 7 October 2011
Thursday, 6 October 2011
- Re: Draft Updated Charter adding Mouse Lock and Gamepad
- Re: Draft Updated Charter adding Mouse Lock and Gamepad
- Re: Draft Updated Charter adding Mouse Lock and Gamepad
- Re: Draft Updated Charter adding Mouse Lock and Gamepad
- Re: Draft Updated Charter adding Mouse Lock and Gamepad
- Re: Google's proposal to add MIDI API to Web Events WG [Was: Fwd: Re: Draft Updated Charter adding Mouse Lock and Gamepad]
- Re: Google's proposal to add MIDI API to Web Events WG [Was: Fwd: Re: Draft Updated Charter adding Mouse Lock and Gamepad]
- Google's proposal to add MIDI API to Web Events WG [Was: Fwd: Re: Draft Updated Charter adding Mouse Lock and Gamepad]
- Re: Gamepad scope
- Re: Gamepad scope
- Re: Gamepad scope
- Gamepad scope
- Re: Draft Updated Charter adding Mouse Lock and Gamepad
Wednesday, 5 October 2011
- Re: Draft Updated Charter adding Mouse Lock and Gamepad
- Re: Draft Updated Charter adding Mouse Lock and Gamepad
- Re: Draft Updated Charter adding Mouse Lock and Gamepad
- Re: Draft Updated Charter adding Mouse Lock and Gamepad
- Re: Draft Updated Charter adding Mouse Lock and Gamepad
- Re: Draft Updated Charter adding Mouse Lock and Gamepad
- Re: gamepad property on events?
- Re: Draft Updated Charter adding Mouse Lock and Gamepad
- Re: Draft Updated Charter adding Mouse Lock and Gamepad
Tuesday, 4 October 2011
Monday, 3 October 2011
Wednesday, 5 October 2011
Tuesday, 4 October 2011
- Re: Draft Updated Charter adding Mouse Lock and Gamepad
- Re: Draft Updated Charter adding Mouse Lock and Gamepad
- Re: Draft Updated Charter adding Mouse Lock and Gamepad
- Issue-19 & Issue-23 [Was: Re: Draft minutes: 20 September 2011 call]
- Host location for gamepads
- Draft minutes: 4 October 2011 call
- Reminder: RfC: LCWD of Touch Events version 1; deadline October 11
- Re: More conformance tests