- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 11:55:40 -0400
- To: "public-webevents@w3.org" <public-webevents@w3.org>
The draft minutes from the October 11 voice conference are available at
the following and copied below:
http://www.w3.org/2011/10/11-webevents-minutes.html
WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send
them to the public-webevents mail list before October 18 (the next
potential voice conference); otherwise these minutes will be considered
Approved as is.
-AB
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
- DRAFT -
Web Events WG Voice Conference
11 Oct 2011
[2]Agenda
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webevents/2011OctDec/0035.html
See also: [3]IRC log
[3] http://www.w3.org/2011/10/11-webevents-irc
Attendees
Present
Art_Barstow, Doug_Schepers, Olli_Pettay, Cathy_Chan,
Sangwhan_Moon
Regrets
Chair
Art
Scribe
Art
Contents
* [4]Topics
1. [5]Tweak Agenda
2. [6]Announcements
3. [7]Issue-21 and Issue-22 ; status of Cathy's proposals
4. [8]Feedback from PFWG on Touch Events 13 September 2011
draft
5. [9]comments from Greg Dennis
6. [10]Plan for Touch Events LC#2
7. [11]Any Other Business (AOB)
* [12]Summary of Action Items
_________________________________________________________
<scribe> ScribeNick: ArtB
<scribe> Scribe: Art
Date: 11 October 2011
Tweak Agenda
AB: I submitted a draft agenda on October 10
[13]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webevents/2011OctDec/
0035.html. Any change requests? The focus today is addressing
comments for the Touch Events LCWD.
... we'll skip testing today
[13] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webevents/2011OctDec/0035.html.
Announcements
AB: any short announcements today?
... re the f2f meeting on Tuesday November 1, I still consider its
status as "undecided" but if we do meet that day it will be
9:00-12:00 maximum and we will have a teleconf bridge for remote
participants.
... given there are only 5 WG members registered yet almost 20
non-members, it may make sense to meet for the first half-hour or so
just to give people an update/status.
... Reminder: October 11 is the deadline for comments for the TEv1
LC
... The comment tracking document is
[14]http://www.w3.org/2010/webevents/wiki/TouchEvents-LCWD-13-Sep-20
11.
[14] http://www.w3.org/2010/webevents/wiki/TouchEvents-LCWD-13-Sep-2011.
Issue-21 and Issue-22 ; status of Cathy's proposals
AB: it looks like Cathy submitted changesets to address Issue-21 and
Issue-22 so I think we can now close both of them
([15]http://www.w3.org/2010/webevents/track/issues/21,
[16]http://www.w3.org/2010/webevents/track/issues/22).
... I already updated the DoC doc to reflect the WG and Commenter
are in agreement (LC-1 and LC-2)
... thanks Cathy!
[15] http://www.w3.org/2010/webevents/track/issues/21
[16] http://www.w3.org/2010/webevents/track/issues/22).
Feedback from PFWG on Touch Events 13 September 2011 draft
AB: the WAI PFWG submitted some comments and no one has responded
yet
[17]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webevents/2011JulSep/
0091.html so let's look at them and make some decisions
... LC-6 and LC-7
... we need someone to agree to propose text to address these issues
[17] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webevents/2011JulSep/0091.html
… any volunteers?
SM: I will take an action to address comment #2
<scribe> ACTION: moon respond to PFWG comment #2 (the editorial
nits) [recorded in
[18]http://www.w3.org/2011/10/11-webevents-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-81 - Respond to PFWG comment #2 (the
editorial nits) [on Sangwhan Moon - due 2011-10-18].
AB: I would split comment #1 into 2 pieces
… one is a request for Primer doc
… and the other asks for a clarification re mouse events and touch
events
DS: we mention that in the charter
AB: "The relation between touch events and mouse
events should be explained in more detail for authors who want to
achieve device independence.
"
DS: agree with that point
… but it is not something the spec should necessarily address
… e.g. this spec does not define mouse events
… and I think that is appropriate
… I do agree having a clear defn would be useful but it doesn't
belong in the TE spec
<smaug> quite bad echo
AB: can you respond to that Doug?
DS: would prefer someone else to take it
SM: OK, I can take care of that
<scribe> ACTION: Moon respond to PFWG comment #1 [recorded in
[19]http://www.w3.org/2011/10/11-webevents-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-82 - Respond to PFWG comment #1 [on
Sangwhan Moon - due 2011-10-18].
AB: do you have enuf info Sangwhan?
SM: yes
DS: agree a Primer-type info would be useful but don't think the TE
spec should include it
AB: ok, then we have a plan to address the PFWG comments
... Sangwhan, when can you address these Actions?
SM: I will try to get a draft out tomorrow
AB: OK, that would be great
comments from Greg Dennis
AB: during the Sept 20 call, we discussed
<[20]http://www.w3.org/2011/09/20-webevents-minutes.html#item03>
comments from Greg Dennis
<[21]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webevents/2011JulSep
/0065.html> and Doug agreed to Action-77
[22]http://www.w3.org/2010/webevents/track/actions/77
[20] http://www.w3.org/2011/09/20-webevents-minutes.html#item03%3E
[21] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webevents/2011JulSep/0065.html%3E
[22] http://www.w3.org/2010/webevents/track/actions/77
<smaug> The echo is really bad
<shepazu> action-77?
<trackbot> ACTION-77 -- Doug Schepers to reply to Greg Dennis table
for each touch event type per agreement on 20-Sep-2011 call -- due
2011-10-10 -- OPEN
<trackbot> [23]http://www.w3.org/2010/webevents/track/actions/77
[23] http://www.w3.org/2010/webevents/track/actions/77
DS: so this is Action-77?
Action-77?
<trackbot> ACTION-77 -- Doug Schepers to reply to Greg Dennis table
for each touch event type per agreement on 20-Sep-2011 call -- due
2011-10-10 -- OPEN
<trackbot> [24]http://www.w3.org/2010/webevents/track/actions/77
[24] http://www.w3.org/2010/webevents/track/actions/77
AB: yes
DS: not sure when I can get to it
SM: is this critical for LC?
DS: good point; we will go back to LC
AB: yes, that's correct
DS: I can point somebody to my code
AB: f.ex.
[25]http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-3-Events/#event-type-DOMActivate
[25] http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-3-Events/#event-type-DOMActivate
<shepazu>
[26]http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-3-Events/#event-types-list
[26] http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-3-Events/#event-types-list
<shepazu>
[27]http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-3-Events/#event-types-list
[27] http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-3-Events/#event-types-list
DS: we can add the table
AB: the table will be normative I presume
DS: what is the LC#2 plan?
AB: I was hoping to publish it next week
SM: could this be easily done with ReSpec?
DS: I think it needs to be modified
AB: is it clear what Greg is asking for?
SM: yes, I think so
DS: yes, I think we have all of the info
… D3E is more specific
… all of the info is derivable
SM: if I have an extra week, I can look into it
AB: can anyone else help?
SM: I can get something out by the end of next week
<scribe> ACTION: moon create an input to address the table requested
by Greg Dennis [recorded in
[28]http://www.w3.org/2011/10/11-webevents-minutes.html#action03]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-83 - Create an input to address the table
requested by Greg Dennis [on Sangwhan Moon - due 2011-10-18].
AB: I'll see if I can get to it sooner
<scribe> ACTION: barstow try to help Sangwhan with Action-83
[recorded in
[29]http://www.w3.org/2011/10/11-webevents-minutes.html#action04]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-84 - Try to help Sangwhan with Action-83
[on Arthur Barstow - due 2011-10-18].
Plan for Touch Events LC#2
AB: I'd like to get a new LC published as soon as we can - Oct 18 if
possible - and certainly before TPAC starts and set a longer term
goal of publishing a Candidate Recommendation in November.
... based on the actions created today, it looks like a pub on Oct
18 won't happen
… but we can still try to get it pub'ed before TPAC
DS: last day to submit a pubreq before TPAC is Oct 25
AB: so that is still do-able
DS: I'll be offline on Oct 24 and limited availability next week
AB: it doesn't seem like that much work is needed to get LC#2 out
DS: yes, I think that's true
AB: I think we have a set of actions
… now we need to execute
AB: anything else on LC#2?
Any Other Business (AOB)
DS: I won't be available next week
… hope to talk to some Members about joining Web Events
… during my biz trip
AB: OK; good
... tentatively have a call next week
… and Sangwhan, please keep me posted on the status of your actions
SM: will do
AB: perhaps we can use email to synch up rather than have a meeting
next week
... anything else for today?
... meeting adjourned
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: barstow try to help Sangwhan with Action-83 [recorded
in [30]http://www.w3.org/2011/10/11-webevents-minutes.html#action04]
[NEW] ACTION: moon create an input to address the table requested by
Greg Dennis [recorded in
[31]http://www.w3.org/2011/10/11-webevents-minutes.html#action03]
[NEW] ACTION: Moon respond to PFWG comment #1 [recorded in
[32]http://www.w3.org/2011/10/11-webevents-minutes.html#action02]
[NEW] ACTION: moon respond to PFWG comment #2 (the editorial nits)
[recorded in
[33]http://www.w3.org/2011/10/11-webevents-minutes.html#action01]
[End of minutes]
Received on Tuesday, 11 October 2011 15:56:14 UTC