- From: Deepanshu gautam <deepanshu.gautam@huawei.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 09:12:35 +0000
- To: Anssi Kostiainen <anssi.kostiainen@nokia.com>
- Cc: ext Scott Graham <scottmg@google.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "public-device-apis@w3.org WG" <public-device-apis@w3.org>, "public-webevents@w3.org" <public-webevents@w3.org>
Seem OK to me, not perfect though :-) Regards Deepanshu Gautam Service Standards, Huawei Software T: +86 25 5260008 M: +86 135 85147627 -----Original Message----- From: Anssi Kostiainen [mailto:anssi.kostiainen@nokia.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 4:34 PM To: Deepanshu gautam Cc: ext Scott Graham; Tab Atkins Jr.; public-device-apis@w3.org WG; public-webevents@w3.org Subject: Re: [vibra] Vibration API Hi, On 16.11.2011, at 8.51, ext Deepanshu gautam wrote: > Is it so very monumental to add simple (not multiple vibration control) Intensity functionality in V1? If not, I would suggest to have it in V1. I think there is a market need for this one. > > More on: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2011Nov/0005.html I'd prefer to apply a similar model employed by the Web Events WG for their Touch Events v1/v2. I.e. v1 and v2 are worked on in parallel, v2 features do not block v1, v1 is about what is already implemented, v2 includes experimental not yet implemented features. Would this work for you? -Anssi
Received on Wednesday, 16 November 2011 09:16:47 UTC