- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 17:25:01 +0100
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Cc: XMLSec <public-xmlsec@w3.org>, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, "Hirsch Frederick (Nokia-CIC/Boston)" <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, "public-webevents@w3.org" <public-webevents@w3.org>, ext Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>, public-webapps@w3.org
Hi Art, the pessimistic XMLSECPAG chair told you that it wouldn't resolve within days. But I hope to have a clear view and plan by the end of January. Executing that plan may take some time. Plan is to resolve until end of March, if everything goes well. Well meaning a decision of the PAG and the execution thereof, not necessarily finding a way to destroy the disclosed patents. The three years can be explained by very promising negotiations with Certicom on an RF license that finally failed because of an overreaching clause on defensive suspension. We were really close to a resolution. Best, Rigo XMLSEC PAG Chair On Wednesday 21 December 2011 09:35:08 Arthur Barstow wrote: > As an FYI for the XMLSec WG members, note that another widget spec was > blocked for two years because of a PAG [1] so it's quite understandable > that having widgets-digsig blocked by YA PAG creates concerns for some > WG members, especially given the ECC PAG Chair's "pessimistic" view [3] > of a "quick" PAG resolution.
Received on Wednesday, 21 December 2011 16:25:44 UTC