W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webevents@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: [vibra] Vibration API

From: Anssi Kostiainen <anssi.kostiainen@nokia.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 10:34:03 +0200
Cc: ext Scott Graham <scottmg@google.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "public-device-apis@w3.org WG" <public-device-apis@w3.org>, "public-webevents@w3.org" <public-webevents@w3.org>
Message-Id: <CF74207F-FABC-4EFC-9386-54AA72284E6A@nokia.com>
To: ext Deepanshu gautam <deepanshu.gautam@huawei.com>

On 16.11.2011, at 8.51, ext Deepanshu gautam wrote:

> Is it so very monumental to add simple (not multiple vibration control) Intensity functionality in V1? If not, I would suggest to have it in V1. I think there is a market need for this one.
> More on: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2011Nov/0005.html

I'd prefer to apply a similar model employed by the Web Events WG for their Touch Events v1/v2. I.e. v1 and v2 are worked on in parallel, v2 features do not block v1, v1 is about what is already implemented, v2 includes experimental not yet implemented features.

Would this work for you?

Received on Wednesday, 16 November 2011 08:34:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:03:54 UTC