public-rdf-wg@w3.org from September 2012 by date

Sunday, 30 September 2012

Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, October 2nd 2012 Manu Sporny
JSON-LD spec updates for September 2012 Manu Sporny

Friday, 28 September 2012

Agenda for 3 October 2012 David Wood
Re: giving up on datasets/trig as more than a web cache Sandro Hawke
Re: giving up on datasets/trig as more than a web cache Yves Raimond
Re: modest proposal for entailment Sandro Hawke
Re: modest proposal for entailment Antoine Zimmermann

Thursday, 27 September 2012

modest proposal for entailment Pat Hayes
Re: giving up on datasets/trig as more than a web cache Steve Harris
Re: giving up on datasets/trig as more than a web cache Antoine Zimmermann
Re: Putting metadata in the "default" graph Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus Steve Harris
giving up on datasets/trig as more than a web cache Sandro Hawke
Re: Putting metadata in the "default" graph Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus Lee Feigenbaum
Re: Putting metadata in the "default" graph Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus Steve Harris
Re: dataset syntax metadata Lee Feigenbaum
Re: Putting metadata in the "default" graph Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus Andy Seaborne
Re: Putting metadata in the "default" graph Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus Steve Harris
Re: Putting metadata in the "default" graph Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus Andy Seaborne
Re: Putting metadata in the "default" graph Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus Steve Harris
Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus Steve Harris
Re: Putting metadata in the "default" graph Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus Andy Seaborne
Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus Antoine Zimmermann
Re: Putting metadata in the "default" graph Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus Steve Harris
Re: Putting metadata in the "default" graph Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus Steve Harris
Re: dataset syntax metadata Antoine Zimmermann
Re: naming dataset syntax Kingsley Idehen

Wednesday, 26 September 2012

Re: naming dataset syntax Ivan Herman
Re: naming dataset syntax Kingsley Idehen
Re: semantics of dataset predicates Pat Hayes
Re: naming dataset syntax David Wood
Re: Are you planning to use the Dataset Semantics? Pat Hayes
Re: naming dataset syntax Arnaud Le Hors
Re: naming dataset syntax Kingsley Idehen
Re: Are you planning to use the Dataset Semantics? Kingsley Idehen
Re: naming dataset syntax David Wood
Re: Are you planning to use the Dataset Semantics? Pat Hayes
Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus David Wood
Re: naming dataset syntax Arnaud Le Hors
Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus Pat Hayes
naming dataset syntax Sandro Hawke
Re: dataset syntax metadata Sandro Hawke
Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus David Wood
Re: dataset syntax metadata Lee Feigenbaum
Re: dataset syntax metadata Sandro Hawke
Re: Putting metadata in the "default" graph Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus David Wood
Re: Putting metadata in the "default" graph Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus Lee Feigenbaum
Re: Putting metadata in the "default" graph Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus David Wood
Re: dataset syntax metadata Lee Feigenbaum
Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus Arnaud Le Hors
Putting metadata in the "default" graph Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus Lee Feigenbaum
Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus Ivan Herman
Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus Ivan Herman
Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus David Wood
Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus Gregg Kellogg
Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus Ted Thibodeau Jr
Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus Kingsley Idehen
Re: dataset syntax metadata Sandro Hawke
dataset metadata, was Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus Sandro Hawke
Re: Are you planning to use the Dataset Semantics? David Wood
Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus Sandro Hawke
Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus Andy Seaborne
Re: dataset syntax metadata Andy Seaborne
Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus Antoine Zimmermann
Re: Are you planning to use the Dataset Semantics? Kingsley Idehen
Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus Kingsley Idehen
Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus Kingsley Idehen
Re: Are you planning to use the Dataset Semantics? Andy Seaborne
Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus Eric Prud'hommeaux
dataset syntax metadata Sandro Hawke
semantics of dataset predicates Sandro Hawke
Re: Are you planning to use the Dataset Semantics? Guus Schreiber
Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus Antoine Zimmermann
Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus Antoine Zimmermann
Re: Are you planning to use the Dataset Semantics? Pat Hayes
Re: Are you planning to use the Dataset Semantics? Antoine Zimmermann
Re: Are you planning to use the Dataset Semantics? Antoine Zimmermann
Re: Are you planning to use the Dataset Semantics? Antoine Zimmermann
Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus Pat Hayes
Re: Are you planning to use the Dataset Semantics? Pat Hayes
Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus Gavin Carothers
Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus Gavin Carothers
Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus Sandro Hawke
Re: Are you planning to use the Dataset Semantics? Sandro Hawke
Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus Pat Hayes
Re: Are you planning to use the Dataset Semantics? Pat Hayes
Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus Lee Feigenbaum
Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus Lee Feigenbaum

Tuesday, 25 September 2012

Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus William Waites
Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus Sandro Hawke
Are you planning to use the Dataset Semantics? Sandro Hawke
JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2012-09-25 Manu Sporny
Re: Really minimal dataset semantics Peter F. Patel-Schneider
[ALL] agenda 26 Sep telecon Guus Schreiber
Re: Really minimal dataset semantics Antoine Zimmermann

Monday, 24 September 2012

Re: Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, September 25th 2012 Manu Sporny
Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, September 25th 2012 Manu Sporny
Re: Dataset Semantics Antoine Zimmermann

Saturday, 22 September 2012

Re: Dataset Semantics Eric Prud'hommeaux
Re: Dataset Semantics Pat Hayes
Re: Really minimal dataset semantics Pat Hayes
Re: Really minimal dataset semantics Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Really minimal dataset semantics Antoine Zimmermann
Re: Really minimal dataset semantics Antoine Zimmermann
Re: Dataset Semantics Eric Prud'hommeaux

Friday, 21 September 2012

Re: Really minimal dataset semantics Pat Hayes
Re: Really minimal dataset semantics Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Really minimal dataset semantics Antoine Zimmermann
Re: Really minimal dataset semantics Antoine Zimmermann
Re: Really minimal dataset semantics Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Dataset Semantics Guus Schreiber
Re: Really minimal dataset semantics Sandro Hawke
Re: [admin] telecon time 30 min earlier? Steve Harris

Thursday, 20 September 2012

Re: Dataset Semantics Pat Hayes
Re: Really minimal dataset semantics Antoine Zimmermann
Re: Dataset Semantics Antoine Zimmermann
Re: Dataset Semantics Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Really minimal dataset semantics Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Dataset Semantics Pat Hayes
Re: [admin] telecon time 30 min earlier? David Wood
Re: [admin] telecon time 30 min earlier? Gavin Carothers
Re: [admin] telecon time 30 min earlier? Pat Hayes
Re: Really minimal dataset semantics Antoine Zimmermann
Re: Dataset Semantics William Waites
Re: Dataset Semantics Antoine Zimmermann
[admin] telecon time 30 min earlier? Guus Schreiber

Wednesday, 19 September 2012

Dataset Semantics Gregg Kellogg
Re: Really minimal dataset semantics Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Really minimal dataset semantics Antoine Zimmermann
Pending review of JSON-LD Syntax Document Gregg Kellogg
Re: life without dataset semantics Sandro Hawke
Re: life without dataset semantics Sandro Hawke
why define where to look for the interpretation of a graph? Eric Prud'hommeaux
Re: life without dataset semantics David Wood
Re: life without dataset semantics Sandro Hawke
Re: life without dataset semantics Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: life without dataset semantics Sandro Hawke
Re: life without dataset semantics Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: life without dataset semantics Sandro Hawke
Re: life without dataset semantics Sandro Hawke
Re: life without dataset semantics Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: life without dataset semantics David Wood
Re: life without dataset semantics Steve Harris
Re: Re 2: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012 Steve Harris
RE: JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2012-09-18 Markus Lanthaler

Tuesday, 18 September 2012

Re: "no-semantics" semantics Antoine Zimmermann
Re: life without dataset semantics David Wood
life without dataset semantics Sandro Hawke
Re: Re 2: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012 David Wood
Re: Re 2: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Re 2: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012 Ivan Herman
Re: Re 2: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" Pat Hayes
Re: Re 2: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012 Pat Hayes
Re: different Semantics proposals (Re: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012) Pat Hayes
Re: different Semantics proposals (Re: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2012-09-18 Gregg Kellogg
Re: different Semantics proposals (Re: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012) Sandro Hawke
Re: different Semantics proposals (Re: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012) Pat Hayes
JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2012-09-18 Manu Sporny
JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2012-09-11 Manu Sporny
Re: "no-semantics" semantics Pat Hayes
Re: different Semantics proposals (Re: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: different Semantics proposals (Re: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: different Semantics proposals (Re: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012) Antoine Zimmermann
Re: different Semantics proposals (Re: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012) David Wood
Re: different Semantics proposals (Re: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012) Richard Cyganiak
Re: different Semantics proposals (Re: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" (Empty named graphs are trivially true) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" (Empty named graphs are trivially true) Antoine Zimmermann
Re: different Semantics proposals (Re: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012) Sandro Hawke
Re: different Semantics proposals (Re: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" (Empty named graphs are trivially true) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: different Semantics proposals (Re: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012) Sandro Hawke
Re: different Semantics proposals (Re: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Re 2: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012 Ivan Herman
Re: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012 Steve Harris
Re: Re 2: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re 2: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012 Ivan Herman
Re: "no-semantics" semantics Ivan Herman
Re: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012 Ivan Herman
Re: "no-semantics" semantics Antoine Zimmermann
"no-semantics" semantics Pat Hayes

Monday, 17 September 2012

different Semantics proposals (Re: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012) Sandro Hawke
Re: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012 Bauer, Herbert S. (Scott)
Re: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012 Pierre-Antoine Champin
Re: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012 David Wood
Re: Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, September 18th 2012 Gregg Kellogg
Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, September 18th 2012 Manu Sporny

Sunday, 16 September 2012

Agenda for 19 Sep 2012 David Wood

Friday, 14 September 2012

Thursday, 13 September 2012

Re: Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" Richard Cyganiak
Re: Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" Peter F. Patel-Schneider
[All] Draft minutes for 12 Sep telecon... Arnaud Le Hors
Re: Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" Antoine Zimmermann
Re: RDF-ISSUE-98 (graph-dataset-semantics-unified): Should the semantics of RDF graphs and the semantics of RDF datasets be combined into one unified semantics? [RDF Semantics] Antoine Zimmermann
Re: Re-wording the semantics Richard Cyganiak
Re: RDF-ISSUE-98 (graph-dataset-semantics-unified): Should the semantics of RDF graphs and the semantics of RDF datasets be combined into one unified semantics? [RDF Semantics] Richard Cyganiak
Re: question Richard Cyganiak
Re: RDF-ISSUE-98 (graph-dataset-semantics-unified): Should the semantics of RDF graphs and the semantics of RDF datasets be combined into one unified semantics? [RDF Semantics] Andy Seaborne
Re: entailments between datasets Richard Cyganiak
Re: XML from tracker Kingsley Idehen
Re: entailments between datasets Antoine Zimmermann
Re: question Antoine Zimmermann
entailments between datasets Pat Hayes
question Pat Hayes
Re-wording the semantics Pat Hayes
Re: Requiring semantic extensions to be AZ-proper? (was: Re: Monotonicity of semantic extensions) Pat Hayes
Re: XML from tracker Sandro Hawke
Re: RDF-ISSUE-98 (graph-dataset-semantics-unified): Should the semantics of RDF graphs and the semantics of RDF datasets be combined into one unified semantics? [RDF Semantics] Pat Hayes
Re: Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" Pat Hayes
Re: Monotonicity of semantic extensions Pat Hayes
Re: Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Wednesday, 12 September 2012

Re: RDF-ISSUE-97 (interpretations-depends-on-V): Should the semantics of RDF graphs be dependent on a vocabulary? [RDF Semantics] Antoine Zimmermann
Re: XML from tracker Kingsley Idehen
Re: XML from tracker Richard Cyganiak
XML from tracker Richard Cyganiak
Re: RDF-ISSUE-97 (interpretations-depends-on-V): Should the semantics of RDF graphs be dependent on a vocabulary? [RDF Semantics] Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: RDF-ISSUE-98 (graph-dataset-semantics-unified): Should the semantics of RDF graphs and the semantics of RDF datasets be combined into one unified semantics? [RDF Semantics] Kingsley Idehen
RDF-ISSUE-98 (graph-dataset-semantics-unified): Should the semantics of RDF graphs and the semantics of RDF datasets be combined into one unified semantics? [RDF Semantics] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
RDF-ISSUE-97 (interpretations-depends-on-V): Should the semantics of RDF graphs be dependent on a vocabulary? [RDF Semantics] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: Requiring semantic extensions to be AZ-proper? Antoine Zimmermann
Re: Monotonicity of semantic extensions Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Requiring semantic extensions to be AZ-proper? (was: Re: Monotonicity of semantic extensions) Richard Cyganiak
Re: Monotonicity of semantic extensions Antoine Zimmermann
Re: Monotonicity of semantic extensions Richard Cyganiak
Re: Monotonicity of semantic extensions Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Monotonicity of semantic extensions (was: Re: Test cases and examples for dataset entailment) Richard Cyganiak
Re: [ALL] draft agenda for 12 Sep telecon Charles Greer

Tuesday, 11 September 2012

Re: Test cases and examples for dataset entailment Antoine Zimmermann
Re: Test cases and examples for dataset entailment Antoine Zimmermann
Re: Test cases and examples for dataset entailment Antoine Zimmermann
Re: Test cases and examples for dataset entailment Richard Cyganiak
Re: Test cases and examples for dataset entailment Richard Cyganiak
Re: Test cases and examples for dataset entailment Richard Cyganiak
Re: Test cases and examples for dataset entailment Antoine Zimmermann
Re: Test cases and examples for dataset entailment Antoine Zimmermann
Re: Test cases and examples for dataset entailment Antoine Zimmermann
Re: Test cases and examples for dataset entailment Andy Seaborne
Re: Test cases and examples for dataset entailment Richard Cyganiak

Monday, 10 September 2012

Re: Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, September 11th 2012 Gregg Kellogg
Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, September 11th 2012 Manu Sporny
Re: Test cases and examples for dataset entailment Richard Cyganiak
Re: Test cases and examples for dataset entailment Ivan Herman
Test cases and examples for dataset entailment Richard Cyganiak
Solve ISSUE-35 and ISSUE-38 by referring to SPARQL 1.1 Service description Antoine Zimmermann
Re: [ALL] draft agenda for 12 Sep telecon Gregg Kellogg
Turtle LC comments Guus Schreiber
[ALL] draft agenda for 12 Sep telecon Guus Schreiber
Re: Moving forward on ISSUE-21 Guus Schreiber

Sunday, 9 September 2012

Re: Blank nodes and SQL sequences Kingsley Idehen
Re: Blank nodes and SQL sequences David Wood

Saturday, 8 September 2012

Re: Blank nodes and SQL sequences Kingsley Idehen
Re: Blank nodes and SQL sequences David Wood
Re: Blank nodes and SQL sequences Richard Cyganiak
Re: Blank nodes and SQL sequences Andy Seaborne

Friday, 7 September 2012

Moving forward on ISSUE-21 (was: Re: Re3 : Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics") Richard Cyganiak
Re: Blank nodes and SQL sequences (was: Re: Why blank nodes?) Steve Harris
Re: Re3 : Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" Antoine Zimmermann
Re: Blank nodes and SQL sequences (was: Re: Why blank nodes?) Richard Cyganiak
Re: Blank nodes and SQL sequences Kingsley Idehen
Re: Blank nodes and SQL sequences (was: Re: Why blank nodes?) Steve Harris
Re: Blank nodes and SQL sequences Sandro Hawke
Re3 : Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" Ivan Herman
Blank nodes and SQL sequences (was: Re: Why blank nodes?) Richard Cyganiak
Re: Why blank nodes? Steve Harris
Re: Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" Ivan Herman
Re: Why blank nodes? Eric Prud'hommeaux
Re: Why blank nodes? Steve Harris
Re: Why blank nodes? Antoine Zimmermann
Why blank nodes? Steve Harris
Re: Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" Antoine Zimmermann
Re: Scope of blank nodes in RDF Steve Harris
Re: Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" Ivan Herman
Re: Scope of blank nodes in RDF Sandro Hawke

Thursday, 6 September 2012

Re: Scope of blank nodes in RDF Richard Cyganiak
Re: Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" Richard Cyganiak
Re: Scope of blank nodes in RDF Richard Cyganiak
Re: Scope of blank nodes in RDF Steve Harris
Re: Scope of blank node labels in TriG/N-Quads Steve Harris
Re: Scope of blank nodes in RDF Sandro Hawke
Re: Scope of blank nodes in RDF David Wood
Re: Scope of blank nodes in RDF Antoine Zimmermann
Re: Use of XSD namespace in RDF recommendations (ISSUE-96) Richard Cyganiak
RDF-ISSUE-96 (XS/OWL2 datatypes): XML Schema and OWL2 custom datatypes [RDF Concepts] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" Antoine Zimmermann
Re: Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" Andy Seaborne
Re: Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" Antoine Zimmermann
Re: Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" Andy Seaborne
Scope of blank nodes in RDF Richard Cyganiak
Re: Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" Ivan Herman
Re: Sharing bnodes Richard Cyganiak
Re: Scope of blank node labels in TriG/N-Quads Richard Cyganiak
Re: Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" Antoine Zimmermann
Re: Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" Andy Seaborne
Re: Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" Ivan Herman
Re: Scope of blank node labels in TriG/N-Quads Andy Seaborne
Re: Scope of blank node labels in TriG/N-Quads Ivan Herman
Re: Scope of blank node labels in TriG/N-Quads Sandro Hawke

Wednesday, 5 September 2012

Re: Scope of blank node labels in TriG/N-Quads Andy Seaborne
Re: Oracle Using TriG? David Wood
Re: Oracle Using TriG? Zhe Wu
Oracle Using TriG? David Wood
Scope of blank node labels in TriG/N-Quads Richard Cyganiak
Minutes: telecon: 2012-09-05 Andy Seaborne
turtle tests Sandro Hawke
Sharing bnodes Antoine Zimmermann
Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" Antoine Zimmermann
RE: [All] Agenda for 5 Sep 2012 Yves Raimond
Re: [All] Agenda for 5 Sep 2012 Pierre-Antoine Champin
JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2012-09-04 Manu Sporny

Tuesday, 4 September 2012

Re: JSON-LD terminology Kingsley Idehen
Re: JSON-LD terminology Richard Cyganiak
[All] Agenda for 5 Sep 2012 David Wood

Monday, 3 September 2012

Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, September 4th 2012 Manu Sporny

Saturday, 1 September 2012

Re: shared bnodes (Skolems, SPARQL) Steve Harris

Last message date: Sunday, 30 September 2012 21:45:43 UTC