Re: Putting metadata in the "default" graph Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus

On 2012-09-27, at 13:04, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:

> On 9/27/2012 7:08 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>> On 26/09/12 17:41, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
>>> We need to support it for compatibility, but I think it's a mistake to
>>> specify that anything important be put in that graph.
>> There are two uses cases: you and Steve emphasis the complicated case of multiple graphs collected from many places.
>> The simple case is one graph.  For that, making the publisher go through "naming" is just overhead for them.
> In the case of one graph, I'd imagine one would use RDF/XML or Turtle or what-not and use traditional ways of specifying metadata.
> Simple or not, I don't think that a single graph is at all a common use case for TriG, and I don't think we should design a TriG metadata approach around it.


- Steve

Steve Harris, CTO
Garlik, a part of Experian
+44 7854 417 874
Registered in England and Wales 653331 VAT # 887 1335 93
80 Victoria Street, London, SW1E 5JL

Received on Thursday, 27 September 2012 12:11:20 UTC