- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:46:52 +0100
- To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Very, very useful.
To show I have read the page ....
==
Worth linking between T3.3 and T8.2 to show the different choices being
made.
== DD 2: "No semantics"
What is the status of:
{ :s :p :o1 , :o2 }
(there is a time/g-box issue here)
== Isomorphism:
(more of an observation)
Isomorphism equivalence is as much a consequence of the simple entailment
{ :s :p _:a1 } entails { :s :p _:a2 }
as much as the consequence of syntax. "no semantics" might be misleading.
Andy
Received on Tuesday, 11 September 2012 09:47:23 UTC