Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus

On 09/26/2012 09:42 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
> On 9/25/12 10:48 PM, Gavin Carothers wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Pat Hayes <> wrote:
>>>> PROPOSED: Our dataset syntax will allow for the expression of empty 
>>>> named graphs, whatever their semantics might be (to be decided). 
>>>> The syntax is an empty curly-braces expression, as in "<g> { }".
>>> +1. However, note that there is only one empty graph: it is unique.
>> Yes! There is only one empty graph. +1 Pat, now my brain hurts less.
> +1

It seems to me that when people say "named graph" they are often (very 
nearly always) referring to a g-box not a g-snap.  When I use the term 
"named graph", I am intentionally being ambiguous.   So, in fact there 
are lots distinct empty "named graphs", since they are empty g-snap 

        -- Sandro

Received on Wednesday, 26 September 2012 14:15:00 UTC