- From: RDF Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 21:03:09 +0000
- To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
RDF-ISSUE-97 (interpretations-depends-on-V): Should the semantics of RDF graphs be dependent on a vocabulary? [RDF Semantics]
http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/97
Raised by: Antoine Zimmermann
On product: RDF Semantics
Currently, all notions of "interpretation" in RDF Semantics depend on a vocabulary V. An interpretation of a vocabulary V cannot interpret terms that are not in V. This leads to certain unexpected non-entailments, for instance:
{ :s :p "2"^^xsd:integer }
does not XSD-entail:
{ :s :p "+2"^^xsd:integer }
or, in RDFS semantics, the triple:
{ ex:s rdf:type rdfs:Resource }
is not true in all graphs.
Received on Wednesday, 12 September 2012 21:03:10 UTC