- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2012 19:31:38 -0400
- To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <504BD55A.30104@openlinksw.com>
On 9/8/12 7:16 PM, David Wood wrote: > The issue, of course, is*whose* sequence. We should be careful not to slip back into a database-centricity, since it has bitten us in the past. There are other, more Web oriented use cases. David, When in the past did you (or anyone else) get bitten by database-centricity? Note, I ask bearing in mind that a relational database isn't the only kind of database. Also bearing in mind that RDF is inextricably linked to the realm of database technology. Methinks, this effort has been bitten in the past by actually trying to disconnect RDF from database technology. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Saturday, 8 September 2012 23:32:02 UTC