Re: Putting metadata in the "default" graph Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus from Andy Seaborne on 2012-09-27 (public-rdf-wg@w3.org from September 2012)

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 12:08:12 +0100
To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <5064339C.5070400@epimorphics.com>

On 26/09/12 17:41, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
> We need to support it for compatibility, but I think it's a mistake to
> specify that anything important be put in that graph.

There are two uses cases: you and Steve emphasis the complicated case of 
multiple graphs collected from many places.

The simple case is one graph.  For that, making the publisher go through 
"naming" is just overhead for them.

	Andy

Received on Thursday, 27 September 2012 11:08:40 UTC