- From: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 09:52:11 -0400
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Hi Kingsley, On Sep 12, 2012, at 17:29, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote: > On 9/12/12 5:12 PM, RDF Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >> RDF-ISSUE-98 (graph-dataset-semantics-unified): Should the semantics of RDF graphs and the semantics of RDF datasets be combined into one unified semantics? [RDF Semantics] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/98 >> >> Raised by: Antoine Zimmermann >> On product: RDF Semantics >> >> So far, all the proposals for a semantics of datasets are simply referring to the semantics of RDF but do not actually modify it. Do we want one notion of interpretation that defines the truth of RDF triples, RDF graphs and RDF datasets all together in a unified way? >> >> >> >> >> > > Does anyone know how I can get XML from: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/98? You might be interested to know that the W3 makes RDF for issues, but (bogusly) it is apparently not published. I had to ask a Team member to mail it to me the last time I wanted it. Regards, Dave > > I ask because the tracker system does claim [1] to offer XML, but doesn't provide a URL pattern example. > > Link: > > 1. http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/features -- note "XML Output" claim . > > -- > > Regards, > > Kingsley Idehen > Founder & CEO > OpenLink Software > Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com > Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen > Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen > Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about > LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen > > > > >
Received on Friday, 14 September 2012 13:52:42 UTC