- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 11:02:05 +0100
- To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Cc: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>, public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On 2012-09-06, at 22:13, Richard Cyganiak wrote: > > And, actually, parsing the same g-text twice creates two separate sets of fresh blank nodes. This is all very weird, but it's the only way how I can make sense of what actually happens as the specs are written and implemented. Parsing a g-text to a g-snap is not idempotent… ಠ_ಠ That's true for other reasons too, as in: <> a <Graph> . I, personally, regard that as a feature. - Steve -- Steve Harris, CTO Garlik, a part of Experian +44 7854 417 874 http://www.garlik.com/ Registered in England and Wales 653331 VAT # 887 1335 93 80 Victoria Street, London, SW1E 5JL
Received on Friday, 7 September 2012 10:02:41 UTC