- From: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>
- Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 07:55:45 +0200
- To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- CC: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, W3C RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Le 26/09/2012 03:54, Pat Hayes a écrit : > > On Sep 25, 2012, at 5:16 PM, Sandro Hawke wrote: > >> >> For myself, at this point I'm 70% convinced that I can implement >> all the dataset use cases I understand (the ones I enumerated in >> the Federated Phonebook examples, plus SPARQL dump/restore) without >> any standard dataset semantics beyond having a standard place for >> metadata (eg the default graph in trig and the service description >> graph in SPARQL). > > Sandro, how can you use metadata *at all* without some way to force a > URI to denote a graph? When you use the URI in the metadata RDF, what > (semantic or even pragmatic) constraint ensures that what it denotes > there is the graph that you have in mind? Or indeed, that it is a > graph at all? Most metadata in the world are provided without any formal semantics that enforces denotation. You know it's metadata about something because it follows the specs. > > Pat > >> >> -- Sandro >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr#cfr >> >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------ IHMC > (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 40 South Alcaniz St. > (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 > 4440 fax FL 32502 (850)291 0667 > mobile phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes > > > > > > > -- Antoine Zimmermann ISCOD / LSTI - Institut Henri Fayol École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint-Étienne 158 cours Fauriel 42023 Saint-Étienne Cedex 2 France Tél:+33(0)4 77 42 83 36 Fax:+33(0)4 77 42 66 66 http://zimmer.aprilfoolsreview.com/
Received on Wednesday, 26 September 2012 05:56:25 UTC