public-rdf-wg@w3.org from September 2012 by author

Andy Seaborne

• Re: Putting metadata in the "default" graph Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus (Thursday, 27 September)
• Re: Putting metadata in the "default" graph Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus (Thursday, 27 September)
• Re: Putting metadata in the "default" graph Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus (Thursday, 27 September)
• Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: dataset syntax metadata (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: Are you planning to use the Dataset Semantics? (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-98 (graph-dataset-semantics-unified): Should the semantics of RDF graphs and the semantics of RDF datasets be combined into one unified semantics? [RDF Semantics] (Thursday, 13 September)
• Re: Test cases and examples for dataset entailment (Tuesday, 11 September)
• Re: Blank nodes and SQL sequences (Saturday, 8 September)
• Re: Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" (Thursday, 6 September)
• Re: Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" (Thursday, 6 September)
• Re: Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" (Thursday, 6 September)
• Re: Scope of blank node labels in TriG/N-Quads (Thursday, 6 September)
• Re: Scope of blank node labels in TriG/N-Quads (Wednesday, 5 September)
• Minutes: telecon: 2012-09-05 (Wednesday, 5 September)

Antoine Zimmermann

• Re: modest proposal for entailment (Friday, 28 September)
• Re: giving up on datasets/trig as more than a web cache (Thursday, 27 September)
• Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus (Thursday, 27 September)
• Re: dataset syntax metadata (Thursday, 27 September)
• Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: Are you planning to use the Dataset Semantics? (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: Are you planning to use the Dataset Semantics? (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: Are you planning to use the Dataset Semantics? (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: Really minimal dataset semantics (Tuesday, 25 September)
• Re: Dataset Semantics (Monday, 24 September)
• Re: Really minimal dataset semantics (Saturday, 22 September)
• Re: Really minimal dataset semantics (Saturday, 22 September)
• Re: Really minimal dataset semantics (Friday, 21 September)
• Re: Really minimal dataset semantics (Friday, 21 September)
• Re: Really minimal dataset semantics (Thursday, 20 September)
• Re: Dataset Semantics (Thursday, 20 September)
• Re: Really minimal dataset semantics (Thursday, 20 September)
• Re: Dataset Semantics (Thursday, 20 September)
• Really minimal dataset semantics (Wednesday, 19 September)
• Re: "no-semantics" semantics (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: different Semantics proposals (Re: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012) (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" (Empty named graphs are trivially true) (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: "no-semantics" semantics (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" (Friday, 14 September)
• Re: Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" (Friday, 14 September)
• Re: entailments between datasets (Friday, 14 September)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-98 (graph-dataset-semantics-unified): Should the semantics of RDF graphs and the semantics of RDF datasets be combined into one unified semantics? [RDF Semantics] (Friday, 14 September)
• Re: Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" (Thursday, 13 September)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-98 (graph-dataset-semantics-unified): Should the semantics of RDF graphs and the semantics of RDF datasets be combined into one unified semantics? [RDF Semantics] (Thursday, 13 September)
• Re: entailments between datasets (Thursday, 13 September)
• Re: question (Thursday, 13 September)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-97 (interpretations-depends-on-V): Should the semantics of RDF graphs be dependent on a vocabulary? [RDF Semantics] (Wednesday, 12 September)
• Re: Requiring semantic extensions to be AZ-proper? (Wednesday, 12 September)
• Re: Monotonicity of semantic extensions (Wednesday, 12 September)
• Re: Test cases and examples for dataset entailment (Tuesday, 11 September)
• Re: Test cases and examples for dataset entailment (Tuesday, 11 September)
• Re: Test cases and examples for dataset entailment (Tuesday, 11 September)
• Re: Test cases and examples for dataset entailment (Tuesday, 11 September)
• Re: Test cases and examples for dataset entailment (Tuesday, 11 September)
• Re: Test cases and examples for dataset entailment (Tuesday, 11 September)
• Solve ISSUE-35 and ISSUE-38 by referring to SPARQL 1.1 Service description (Monday, 10 September)
• Re: Re3 : Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" (Friday, 7 September)
• Re: Why blank nodes? (Friday, 7 September)
• Re: Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" (Friday, 7 September)
• Re: Scope of blank nodes in RDF (Thursday, 6 September)
• Re: Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" (Thursday, 6 September)
• Re: Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" (Thursday, 6 September)
• Re: Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" (Thursday, 6 September)
• Sharing bnodes (Wednesday, 5 September)
• Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" (Wednesday, 5 September)

Arnaud Le Hors

• Re: naming dataset syntax (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: naming dataset syntax (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus (Wednesday, 26 September)
• [All] Draft minutes for 12 Sep telecon... (Thursday, 13 September)

Bauer, Herbert S. (Scott)

• Re: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012 (Monday, 17 September)

Charles Greer

• Re: [ALL] draft agenda for 12 Sep telecon (Wednesday, 12 September)

David Wood

• Agenda for 3 October 2012 (Friday, 28 September)
• Re: naming dataset syntax (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: naming dataset syntax (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: Putting metadata in the "default" graph Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: Putting metadata in the "default" graph Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: Are you planning to use the Dataset Semantics? (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: [admin] telecon time 30 min earlier? (Thursday, 20 September)
• Re: life without dataset semantics (Wednesday, 19 September)
• Re: life without dataset semantics (Wednesday, 19 September)
• Re: life without dataset semantics (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: Re 2: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012 (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: different Semantics proposals (Re: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012) (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012 (Monday, 17 September)
• Agenda for 19 Sep 2012 (Sunday, 16 September)
• Re: RDF from Tracker (was Re: RDF-ISSUE-98 (graph-dataset-semantics-unified): Should the semantics of RDF graphs and the semantics of RDF datasets be combined into one unified semantics? [RDF Semantics] (Friday, 14 September)
• RDF from Tracker (was Re: RDF-ISSUE-98 (graph-dataset-semantics-unified): Should the semantics of RDF graphs and the semantics of RDF datasets be combined into one unified semantics? [RDF Semantics] (Friday, 14 September)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-98 (graph-dataset-semantics-unified): Should the semantics of RDF graphs and the semantics of RDF datasets be combined into one unified semantics? [RDF Semantics] (Friday, 14 September)
• Re: Blank nodes and SQL sequences (Sunday, 9 September)
• Re: Blank nodes and SQL sequences (Saturday, 8 September)
• Re: Scope of blank nodes in RDF (Thursday, 6 September)
• Re: Oracle Using TriG? (Wednesday, 5 September)
• Oracle Using TriG? (Wednesday, 5 September)
• [All] Agenda for 5 Sep 2012 (Tuesday, 4 September)

Eric Prud'hommeaux

• Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: Dataset Semantics (Saturday, 22 September)
• Re: Dataset Semantics (Saturday, 22 September)
• why define where to look for the interpretation of a graph? (Wednesday, 19 September)
• Re: Why blank nodes? (Friday, 7 September)

Gavin Carothers

• Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: [admin] telecon time 30 min earlier? (Thursday, 20 September)

Gregg Kellogg

• Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Dataset Semantics (Wednesday, 19 September)
• Pending review of JSON-LD Syntax Document (Wednesday, 19 September)
• Re: JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2012-09-18 (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, September 18th 2012 (Monday, 17 September)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-98 (graph-dataset-semantics-unified): Should the semantics of RDF graphs and the semantics of RDF datasets be combined into one unified semantics? [RDF Semantics] (Friday, 14 September)
• Re: Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, September 11th 2012 (Monday, 10 September)
• Re: [ALL] draft agenda for 12 Sep telecon (Monday, 10 September)

Guus Schreiber

• Re: Are you planning to use the Dataset Semantics? (Wednesday, 26 September)
• [ALL] agenda 26 Sep telecon (Tuesday, 25 September)
• Re: Dataset Semantics (Friday, 21 September)
• [admin] telecon time 30 min earlier? (Thursday, 20 September)
• Turtle LC comments (Monday, 10 September)
• [ALL] draft agenda for 12 Sep telecon (Monday, 10 September)
• Re: Moving forward on ISSUE-21 (Monday, 10 September)

Ivan Herman

• Re: naming dataset syntax (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: Re 2: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012 (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: Re 2: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012 (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re 2: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012 (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: "no-semantics" semantics (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012 (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" (Friday, 14 September)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-98 (graph-dataset-semantics-unified): Should the semantics of RDF graphs and the semantics of RDF datasets be combined into one unified semantics? [RDF Semantics] (Friday, 14 September)
• Re: Test cases and examples for dataset entailment (Monday, 10 September)
• Re3 : Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" (Friday, 7 September)
• Re: Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" (Friday, 7 September)
• Re: Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" (Friday, 7 September)
• Re: Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" (Thursday, 6 September)
• Re: Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" (Thursday, 6 September)
• Re: Scope of blank node labels in TriG/N-Quads (Thursday, 6 September)

Kingsley Idehen

• Re: naming dataset syntax (Thursday, 27 September)
• Re: naming dataset syntax (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: naming dataset syntax (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: Are you planning to use the Dataset Semantics? (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: Are you planning to use the Dataset Semantics? (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Seeking RDF Dumps for W3C Issue Tracker (Friday, 14 September)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-98 (graph-dataset-semantics-unified): Should the semantics of RDF graphs and the semantics of RDF datasets be combined into one unified semantics? [RDF Semantics] (Friday, 14 September)
• Re: XML from tracker (Thursday, 13 September)
• Re: XML from tracker (Wednesday, 12 September)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-98 (graph-dataset-semantics-unified): Should the semantics of RDF graphs and the semantics of RDF datasets be combined into one unified semantics? [RDF Semantics] (Wednesday, 12 September)
• Re: Blank nodes and SQL sequences (Sunday, 9 September)
• Re: Blank nodes and SQL sequences (Saturday, 8 September)
• Re: Blank nodes and SQL sequences (Friday, 7 September)
• Re: JSON-LD terminology (Tuesday, 4 September)

Lee Feigenbaum

• Re: Putting metadata in the "default" graph Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus (Thursday, 27 September)
• Re: dataset syntax metadata (Thursday, 27 September)
• Re: dataset syntax metadata (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: Putting metadata in the "default" graph Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: dataset syntax metadata (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Putting metadata in the "default" graph Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus (Wednesday, 26 September)

Manu Sporny

• Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, October 2nd 2012 (Sunday, 30 September)
• JSON-LD spec updates for September 2012 (Sunday, 30 September)
• JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2012-09-25 (Tuesday, 25 September)
• Re: Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, September 25th 2012 (Monday, 24 September)
• Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, September 25th 2012 (Monday, 24 September)
• JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2012-09-18 (Tuesday, 18 September)
• JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2012-09-11 (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, September 18th 2012 (Monday, 17 September)
• Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, September 11th 2012 (Monday, 10 September)
• JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2012-09-04 (Wednesday, 5 September)
• Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, September 4th 2012 (Monday, 3 September)

Markus Lanthaler

• RE: JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2012-09-18 (Wednesday, 19 September)

Pat Hayes

• modest proposal for entailment (Thursday, 27 September)
• Re: semantics of dataset predicates (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: Are you planning to use the Dataset Semantics? (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: Are you planning to use the Dataset Semantics? (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: Are you planning to use the Dataset Semantics? (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: Are you planning to use the Dataset Semantics? (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: Are you planning to use the Dataset Semantics? (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: Dataset Semantics (Saturday, 22 September)
• Re: Really minimal dataset semantics (Saturday, 22 September)
• Re: Really minimal dataset semantics (Friday, 21 September)
• Re: Dataset Semantics (Thursday, 20 September)
• Re: Dataset Semantics (Thursday, 20 September)
• Re: [admin] telecon time 30 min earlier? (Thursday, 20 September)
• Re: Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: Re 2: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012 (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: different Semantics proposals (Re: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012) (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: different Semantics proposals (Re: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012) (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: "no-semantics" semantics (Tuesday, 18 September)
• "no-semantics" semantics (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: entailments between datasets (Friday, 14 September)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-98 (graph-dataset-semantics-unified): Should the semantics of RDF graphs and the semantics of RDF datasets be combined into one unified semantics? [RDF Semantics] (Friday, 14 September)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-98 (graph-dataset-semantics-unified): Should the semantics of RDF graphs and the semantics of RDF datasets be combined into one unified semantics? [RDF Semantics] (Friday, 14 September)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-98 (graph-dataset-semantics-unified): Should the semantics of RDF graphs and the semantics of RDF datasets be combined into one unified semantics? [RDF Semantics] (Friday, 14 September)
• Re: entailments between datasets (Friday, 14 September)
• Re: Re-wording the semantics (Friday, 14 September)
• Re: question (Friday, 14 September)
• entailments between datasets (Thursday, 13 September)
• question (Thursday, 13 September)
• Re-wording the semantics (Thursday, 13 September)
• Re: Requiring semantic extensions to be AZ-proper? (was: Re: Monotonicity of semantic extensions) (Thursday, 13 September)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-98 (graph-dataset-semantics-unified): Should the semantics of RDF graphs and the semantics of RDF datasets be combined into one unified semantics? [RDF Semantics] (Thursday, 13 September)
• Re: Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" (Thursday, 13 September)
• Re: Monotonicity of semantic extensions (Thursday, 13 September)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• Re: Really minimal dataset semantics (Tuesday, 25 September)
• Re: Really minimal dataset semantics (Saturday, 22 September)
• Re: Really minimal dataset semantics (Friday, 21 September)
• Re: Really minimal dataset semantics (Friday, 21 September)
• Re: Dataset Semantics (Thursday, 20 September)
• Re: Really minimal dataset semantics (Thursday, 20 September)
• Re: Really minimal dataset semantics (Wednesday, 19 September)
• Re: life without dataset semantics (Wednesday, 19 September)
• Re: life without dataset semantics (Wednesday, 19 September)
• Re: life without dataset semantics (Wednesday, 19 September)
• Re: Re 2: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012 (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: Re 2: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012 (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: different Semantics proposals (Re: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012) (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: different Semantics proposals (Re: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012) (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: different Semantics proposals (Re: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012) (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: different Semantics proposals (Re: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012) (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" (Empty named graphs are trivially true) (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: different Semantics proposals (Re: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012) (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" (Empty named graphs are trivially true) (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: different Semantics proposals (Re: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012) (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: Re 2: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012 (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012 (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012 (Monday, 17 September)
• Re: Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" (Friday, 14 September)
• Re: Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" (Thursday, 13 September)
• Re: Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" (Thursday, 13 September)
• Re: Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" (Thursday, 13 September)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-97 (interpretations-depends-on-V): Should the semantics of RDF graphs be dependent on a vocabulary? [RDF Semantics] (Wednesday, 12 September)
• Re: Monotonicity of semantic extensions (Wednesday, 12 September)
• Re: Monotonicity of semantic extensions (Wednesday, 12 September)

Pierre-Antoine Champin

• Re: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012 (Monday, 17 September)
• Re: [All] Agenda for 5 Sep 2012 (Wednesday, 5 September)

RDF Working Group Issue Tracker

• RDF-ISSUE-98 (graph-dataset-semantics-unified): Should the semantics of RDF graphs and the semantics of RDF datasets be combined into one unified semantics? [RDF Semantics] (Wednesday, 12 September)
• RDF-ISSUE-97 (interpretations-depends-on-V): Should the semantics of RDF graphs be dependent on a vocabulary? [RDF Semantics] (Wednesday, 12 September)
• RDF-ISSUE-96 (XS/OWL2 datatypes): XML Schema and OWL2 custom datatypes [RDF Concepts] (Thursday, 6 September)

Richard Cyganiak

• Re: different Semantics proposals (Re: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012) (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" (Thursday, 13 September)
• Re: Re-wording the semantics (Thursday, 13 September)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-98 (graph-dataset-semantics-unified): Should the semantics of RDF graphs and the semantics of RDF datasets be combined into one unified semantics? [RDF Semantics] (Thursday, 13 September)
• Re: question (Thursday, 13 September)
• Re: entailments between datasets (Thursday, 13 September)
• Re: XML from tracker (Wednesday, 12 September)
• XML from tracker (Wednesday, 12 September)
• Requiring semantic extensions to be AZ-proper? (was: Re: Monotonicity of semantic extensions) (Wednesday, 12 September)
• Re: Monotonicity of semantic extensions (Wednesday, 12 September)
• Monotonicity of semantic extensions (was: Re: Test cases and examples for dataset entailment) (Wednesday, 12 September)
• Re: Test cases and examples for dataset entailment (Tuesday, 11 September)
• Re: Test cases and examples for dataset entailment (Tuesday, 11 September)
• Re: Test cases and examples for dataset entailment (Tuesday, 11 September)
• Re: Test cases and examples for dataset entailment (Tuesday, 11 September)
• Re: Test cases and examples for dataset entailment (Monday, 10 September)
• Test cases and examples for dataset entailment (Monday, 10 September)
• Re: Blank nodes and SQL sequences (Saturday, 8 September)
• Moving forward on ISSUE-21 (was: Re: Re3 : Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics") (Friday, 7 September)
• Re: Blank nodes and SQL sequences (was: Re: Why blank nodes?) (Friday, 7 September)
• Blank nodes and SQL sequences (was: Re: Why blank nodes?) (Friday, 7 September)
• Re: Scope of blank nodes in RDF (Thursday, 6 September)
• Re: Draft for a "minimal dataset semantics" (Thursday, 6 September)
• Re: Scope of blank nodes in RDF (Thursday, 6 September)
• Re: Use of XSD namespace in RDF recommendations (ISSUE-96) (Thursday, 6 September)
• Scope of blank nodes in RDF (Thursday, 6 September)
• Re: Sharing bnodes (Thursday, 6 September)
• Re: Scope of blank node labels in TriG/N-Quads (Thursday, 6 September)
• Scope of blank node labels in TriG/N-Quads (Wednesday, 5 September)
• Re: JSON-LD terminology (Tuesday, 4 September)

Sandro Hawke

• Re: giving up on datasets/trig as more than a web cache (Friday, 28 September)
• Re: modest proposal for entailment (Friday, 28 September)
• giving up on datasets/trig as more than a web cache (Thursday, 27 September)
• naming dataset syntax (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: dataset syntax metadata (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: dataset syntax metadata (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: dataset syntax metadata (Wednesday, 26 September)
• dataset metadata, was Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus (Wednesday, 26 September)
• dataset syntax metadata (Wednesday, 26 September)
• semantics of dataset predicates (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: Are you planning to use the Dataset Semantics? (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus (Tuesday, 25 September)
• Are you planning to use the Dataset Semantics? (Tuesday, 25 September)
• Re: Really minimal dataset semantics (Friday, 21 September)
• Re: life without dataset semantics (Wednesday, 19 September)
• Re: life without dataset semantics (Wednesday, 19 September)
• Re: life without dataset semantics (Wednesday, 19 September)
• Re: life without dataset semantics (Wednesday, 19 September)
• Re: life without dataset semantics (Wednesday, 19 September)
• Re: life without dataset semantics (Wednesday, 19 September)
• life without dataset semantics (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: different Semantics proposals (Re: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012) (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: different Semantics proposals (Re: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012) (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: different Semantics proposals (Re: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012) (Tuesday, 18 September)
• different Semantics proposals (Re: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012) (Monday, 17 September)
• Re: RDF from Tracker (was Re: RDF-ISSUE-98 (graph-dataset-semantics-unified): Should the semantics of RDF graphs and the semantics of RDF datasets be combined into one unified semantics? [RDF Semantics] (Friday, 14 September)
• Re: XML from tracker (Thursday, 13 September)
• Re: Blank nodes and SQL sequences (Friday, 7 September)
• Re: Scope of blank nodes in RDF (Friday, 7 September)
• Re: Scope of blank nodes in RDF (Thursday, 6 September)
• Re: Scope of blank node labels in TriG/N-Quads (Thursday, 6 September)
• turtle tests (Wednesday, 5 September)

Steve Harris

• Re: giving up on datasets/trig as more than a web cache (Thursday, 27 September)
• Re: Putting metadata in the "default" graph Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus (Thursday, 27 September)
• Re: Putting metadata in the "default" graph Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus (Thursday, 27 September)
• Re: Putting metadata in the "default" graph Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus (Thursday, 27 September)
• Re: Putting metadata in the "default" graph Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus (Thursday, 27 September)
• Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus (Thursday, 27 September)
• Re: Putting metadata in the "default" graph Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus (Thursday, 27 September)
• Re: Putting metadata in the "default" graph Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus (Thursday, 27 September)
• Re: [admin] telecon time 30 min earlier? (Friday, 21 September)
• Re: life without dataset semantics (Wednesday, 19 September)
• Re: Re 2: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012 (Wednesday, 19 September)
• Re: Agenda for 19 Sep 2012 (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: Blank nodes and SQL sequences (was: Re: Why blank nodes?) (Friday, 7 September)
• Re: Blank nodes and SQL sequences (was: Re: Why blank nodes?) (Friday, 7 September)
• Re: Why blank nodes? (Friday, 7 September)
• Re: Why blank nodes? (Friday, 7 September)
• Why blank nodes? (Friday, 7 September)
• Re: Scope of blank nodes in RDF (Friday, 7 September)
• Re: Scope of blank nodes in RDF (Thursday, 6 September)
• Re: Scope of blank node labels in TriG/N-Quads (Thursday, 6 September)
• Re: shared bnodes (Skolems, SPARQL) (Saturday, 1 September)

Ted Thibodeau Jr

• Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus (Wednesday, 26 September)

William Waites

• Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus (Tuesday, 25 September)
• Re: Dataset Semantics (Thursday, 20 September)

Yves Raimond

• Re: giving up on datasets/trig as more than a web cache (Friday, 28 September)
• RE: [All] Agenda for 5 Sep 2012 (Wednesday, 5 September)

Zhe Wu

• Re: Oracle Using TriG? (Wednesday, 5 September)

Last message date: Sunday, 30 September 2012 21:45:43 UTC