- From: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>
- Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 10:44:29 +0200
- To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- CC: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>, RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Le 22/09/2012 23:02, Eric Prud'hommeaux a écrit : <skip/> > > I suspect we want to explicitly write this use case off, but, if I write a test for CREATE, it would add a pair<n, emptyRDFgraph> to a dataset, e.g. > before: > {<s1> <p1> <o1> } > op: > CREATE<foo> > after: > {<s1> <p1> <o1> }<foo> { } FWIW, in the proposal at http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/TF-Graphs/Minimal-dataset-semantics, the "before" is not equivalent to the "after". "after" entails "before", but not the opposite, as <foo> does not belong to the vocabulary of "before". What the semantics says informally is: <foo> { } means that there is a graph associated with <foo>. > > The before and after states are identical by the semantics you describe. That's probably not a big deal because not all implementations are expected to discriminate empty graphs from non-existent ones; the WG doesn't provide any tests like the one above. <skip/> -- Antoine Zimmermann ISCOD / LSTI - Institut Henri Fayol École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint-Étienne 158 cours Fauriel 42023 Saint-Étienne Cedex 2 France Tél:+33(0)4 77 42 66 03 Fax:+33(0)4 77 42 66 66 http://zimmer.aprilfoolsreview.com/
Received on Monday, 24 September 2012 08:44:56 UTC