Friday, 30 March 2012
- Re: Description and thoughts behind option 6 (part 1 of 2)
- Re: Description and thoughts behind option 6 (part 1 of 2)
- Definitions for option 6 (part 2 of 2)
- Description and thoughts behind option 6 (part 1 of 2)
Wednesday, 28 March 2012
Tuesday, 27 March 2012
- Minutes for March 27 teleconf
- RE: property paths
- Re: ACTION-593: SPARQL CSV/TSV review
- ACTION-593: SPARQL CSV/TSV review
- Re: property paths
- Re: property paths
Monday, 26 March 2012
- RE: property paths
- SPARQL TC 2012-03-27: Agenda
- Overview document (ACTION-595)
- Re: property paths
- RE: property paths
- property paths
Tuesday, 20 March 2012
- SPARQL WG minutes
- Re: today's SPARQL agenda
- Re: today's SPARQL agenda
- Re: today's SPARQL agenda
- Re: today's SPARQL agenda
- Re: today's SPARQL agenda
- Re: today's SPARQL agenda
- Re: today's SPARQL agenda
- Re: today's SPARQL agenda
- today's SPARQL agenda
Monday, 19 March 2012
Sunday, 18 March 2012
Wednesday, 14 March 2012
- Re: DISTINCT()
- Re: DISTINCT()
- Re: DISTINCT()
- Re: DISTINCT()
- Re: DISTINCT()
- Re: DISTINCT()
- Re: DISTINCT()
- RE: DISTINCT()
- RE: DISTINCT()
- Re: DISTINCT()
- DISTINCT()
- SPARQL TC 2012-03-13 : minutes
Tuesday, 13 March 2012
- Re: @Editors: Acknowledgements sections for all drafts...
- RE: SPARQL TC 2012-03-13 : Status?
- Re: Defining property paths
Monday, 12 March 2012
- Re: Defining property paths
- Re: Defining property paths
- RE: SPARQL TC 2012-03-13 : Status?
- Re: SPARQL TC 2012-03-13 : Status?
- SPARQL TC 2012-03-12 : Status?
Sunday, 11 March 2012
Thursday, 8 March 2012
- RE: Defining property paths
- Re: Defining property paths
- RE: Defining property paths
- Re: Defining property paths
Wednesday, 7 March 2012
Tuesday, 6 March 2012
Monday, 5 March 2012
- Re: SPARQL TC 2012-03-06
- Re: ACTION-598 Open comments
- SPARQL TC 2012-03-06
- ACTION-598 Open comments
- review of CSV/TSV (ACTION-594)
- Re: ACTION-597: Review Overview doc for LC readiness by completion of ACTION-595
Friday, 2 March 2012
- Re: Defining property paths
- Re: Defining property paths
- Re: Defining property paths
- Defining property paths
Tuesday, 28 February 2012
- Re: @Editors: Acknowledgements sections for all drafts...
- @Editors: Acknowledgements sections for all drafts...
- today's minutes
- Re: addressing JP-5 (was: Re: comments JP-4 how to proceed?)
- Re: chairing problem and Agenda SPARQL TC 2012-02-21
- Re: Graph store protocol editor's draft updated
- Re: Graph store protocol editor's draft updated
- Re: Graph store protocol editor's draft updated
- Re: Graph store protocol editor's draft updated
- Re: comments JP-4 how to proceed?
- Re: Graph store protocol editor's draft updated
Monday, 27 February 2012
- Re: SPARQL TelCo 2012-02-28
- Re: Property path summary and ways forward
- Re: Property path summary and ways forward
- Property path summary and ways forward
- Re: addressing JP-5
- addressing JP-5 (was: Re: comments JP-4 how to proceed?)
- thoughts on SPARQL WG schedule
- Re: comments JP-4 how to proceed?
- SPARQL TelCo 2012-02-28
- Re: comments JP-4 how to proceed?
Tuesday, 21 February 2012
- today's minutes
- Property Paths Use Case
- Re: chairing problem and Agenda SPARQL TC 2012-02-21
- regrets
- Re: chairing problem and Agenda SPARQL TC 2012-02-21
- Re: comments JP-4 how to proceed?
- regrets
- comments JP-4 how to proceed?
- Re: chairing problem and Agenda SPARQL TC 2012-02-21
Monday, 20 February 2012
- Re: chairing problem and Agenda SPARQL TC 2012-02-21
- Errata : grammar : problem with compound subject nodes and property paths.
- chairing problem and Agenda SPARQL TC 2012-02-21
Friday, 17 February 2012
- Re: Graph store protocol editor's draft updated
- Re: Graph store protocol editor's draft updated
- Re: Graph store protocol editor's draft updated
- Re: Graph store protocol editor's draft updated
- Re: Graph store protocol editor's draft updated
Thursday, 16 February 2012
Wednesday, 15 February 2012
- Re: Graph store protocol editor's draft updated
- Comments about the complexity of evaluating property paths
- Re: Graph store protocol editor's draft updated
Tuesday, 14 February 2012
- Re: Graph store protocol editor's draft updated
- Fwd: SPARQL Telco today: Agenda
- Minutes
- Re: Graph store protocol editor's draft updated
- Property Paths and Entailment
- Re: Comment response: DB-18 (Escapes in prefix names)
- Re: Comment response: DB-18 (Escapes in prefix names)
- Re: Comment response: DB-18 (Escapes in prefix names)
- Re: Graph store protocol editor's draft updated
- Re: Graph store protocol editor's draft updated
- Re: Comment response: DB-18 (Escapes in prefix names)
- Re: Comment response: DB-19 (decimal syntax)
- Re: Comment response: DB-17 (feedback on percent encoding in prefix names)
Monday, 13 February 2012
- Re: Graph store protocol editor's draft updated
- Re: Graph store protocol editor's draft updated
- Re: Comment response: DB-18 (Escapes in prefix names)
- Re: Comment response: DB-19 (decimal syntax)
- Re: Comment response: DB-17 (feedback on percent encoding in prefix names)
- Re: summary on options for JP-4 Comment about the semantics of property paths
- Re: Comment on SPARQL 1.1 CSV Results
Sunday, 12 February 2012
- Comment response: DB-18 (Escapes in prefix names)
- Comment response: DB-17 (feedback on percent encoding in prefix names)
- Comment response: DB-19 (decimal syntax)
- Re: MO-1 draft response (ACTION-588)
- Re: summary on options for JP-4 Comment about the semantics of property paths
- Re: summary on options for JP-4 Comment about the semantics of property paths
Saturday, 11 February 2012
- Re: summary on options for JP-4 Comment about the semantics of property paths
- Re: Draft text for asking for implementation reports
- Re: summary on options for JP-4 Comment about the semantics of property paths
- Re: summary on options for JP-4 Comment about the semantics of property paths
- Re: summary on options for JP-4 Comment about the semantics of property paths
- Re: summary on options for JP-4 Comment about the semantics of property paths
- Re: summary on options for JP-4 Comment about the semantics of property paths
- Re: summary on options for JP-4 Comment about the semantics of property paths
- Re: summary on options for JP-4 Comment about the semantics of property paths
- Re: summary on options for JP-4 Comment about the semantics of property paths
- Re: summary on options for JP-4 Comment about the semantics of property paths
- Re: summary on options for JP-4 Comment about the semantics of property paths
- Re: summary on options for JP-4 Comment about the semantics of property paths
Friday, 10 February 2012
- Re: summary on options for JP-4 Comment about the semantics of property paths
- Re: summary on options for JP-4 Comment about the semantics of property paths
Thursday, 9 February 2012
- Re: summary on options for JP-4 Comment about the semantics of property paths
- summary on options for JP-4 Comment about the semantics of property paths
- License on test generator script Re: Draft text for asking for implementation reports
Wednesday, 8 February 2012
- Re: Draft text for asking for implementation reports
- Re: MO-1 draft response (ACTION-588)
- Draft text for asking for implementation reports
Tuesday, 7 February 2012
- Fwd: Today's minutes
- MO-1 draft response (ACTION-588)
- Re: Comments about the semantics of property paths
- Re: SPARQL Telco tomorrow.
Monday, 6 February 2012
- Re: Comments about the semantics of property paths
- Re: comment response for MO-1
- Re: SPARQL Telco tomorrow.
- Re: Graph store protocol editor's draft updated
- SPARQL Telco tomorrow.
- Re: Graph store protocol editor's draft updated
- Unavailable for February 7 telecom
- Re: Comment on SPARQL 1.1 CSV Results
- Re: Comment on SPARQL 1.1 CSV Results
- Re: Comment on SPARQL 1.1 CSV Results
- Re: Comment on SPARQL 1.1 CSV Results
- Re: Comment on SPARQL 1.1 CSV Results
- Re: Comment on SPARQL 1.1 CSV Results
Sunday, 5 February 2012
- Re: Comment on SPARQL 1.1 CSV Results
- Re: Comment on SPARQL 1.1 CSV Results
- Re: EARL instructions for SPARQL 1.1 test suite?
Friday, 3 February 2012
- Re: COPY/MOVE tests
- Re: COPY/MOVE tests
- Re: COPY/MOVE tests
- COPY/MOVE tests
- Re: EARL instructions for SPARQL 1.1 test suite?
- Re: EARL instructions for SPARQL 1.1 test suite?
- Re: EARL instructions for SPARQL 1.1 test suite?
- Graph store protocol editor's draft updated
- EARL instructions for SPARQL 1.1 test suite?
Thursday, 2 February 2012
Tuesday, 31 January 2012
- Re: comment response for MO-1
- Re: new test cases
- new test cases
- comment response for MO-1
- Today's Minutes
- Re: Agenda Telco Today
- Re: Agenda Telco Today
- Agenda Telco Today
Sunday, 29 January 2012
- Re: Fwd: Comments about the semantics of property paths
- Re: Fwd: Comments about the semantics of property paths
- Re: Fwd: Comments about the semantics of property paths
Saturday, 28 January 2012
Friday, 27 January 2012
Thursday, 26 January 2012
- Re: ACTION-575: Propose tests for ADD, MOVE, and COPY
- Re: ACTION-575: Propose tests for ADD, MOVE, and COPY
Tuesday, 24 January 2012
- ACTION-580: new implementations report
- Re: Test functions/if01.rq
- Re: Test functions/if01.rq
- Re: Test functions/if01.rq
- Re: ACTION-575: Propose tests for ADD, MOVE, and COPY
- Test functions/if01.rq
- Re: Minute of the meeting 2012-01-24
- Minute of the meeting 2012-01-24
- Re: ACTION-575: Propose tests for ADD, MOVE, and COPY
- Re: Today's SPARQL WG Agenda
- Today's SPARQL WG Agenda
Friday, 20 January 2012
Wednesday, 18 January 2012
Tuesday, 17 January 2012
- ACTION-574: positive EXISTS tests
- Meeting minutes 17 Jan 2012
- Re: Tomorrow's SPARQL WG Call
- Re: Tomorrow's SPARQL WG Call
- Re: Tomorrow's SPARQL WG Call
- Tomorrow's SPARQL WG Call
Monday, 16 January 2012
Sunday, 15 January 2012
Wednesday, 11 January 2012
Tuesday, 10 January 2012
- Re: SPARQL WG Agenda for 2012-Jan-10
- Today's resolutions on graph store protocol
- Re: Copyright of test materials
- Re: next steps on http graph store protocol
- mintues
- Re: next steps on http graph store protocol
- Re: next steps on http graph store protocol
- Re: next steps on http graph store protocol
- Re: next steps on http graph store protocol
- Re: next steps on http graph store protocol
- Re: SPARQL WG Agenda for 2012-Jan-10
- Re: next steps on http graph store protocol
- Re: next steps on http graph store protocol
- Re: next steps on http graph store protocol
- Regrets
- Re: next steps on http graph store protocol
- Re: next steps on http graph store protocol
- Re: next steps on http graph store protocol
Monday, 9 January 2012
- Re: next steps on http graph store protocol
- Re: next steps on http graph store protocol
- Re: regrets for tomorrow & next steps
- SPARQL WG Agenda for 2012-Jan-10
- Re: regrets for tomorrow & next steps
- regrets for tomorrow & next steps
- Re: next steps on http graph store protocol
- Re: next steps on http graph store protocol
- Re: next steps on http graph store protocol
Sunday, 8 January 2012
Saturday, 7 January 2012
Friday, 6 January 2012
- Re: next steps on http graph store protocol
- Re: next steps on http graph store protocol
- Re: next steps on http graph store protocol
- next steps on http graph store protocol
- Re: Questions and comments on SPARQL 1.1 Graph Store HTTP Protocol draft
Thursday, 5 January 2012
- Call for Exclusions: Five SPARQL 1.1 Specifications
- Re: Publications ready to go (almost)
- Re: Publications ready to go (almost)
- Re: Publications ready to go (almost)
- Re: Publications ready to go (almost)
- Publications ready to go (almost)
- Re: Minutes
Wednesday, 4 January 2012
- Re: Minutes
- Re: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:NL-1
- Re: Proposed text for clarifying protocol conformance
- Re: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:NL-1
- Re: LC dates
- Re: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:NL-1
- http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:NL-1
Tuesday, 3 January 2012
- Re: Proposed text for clarifying protocol conformance
- LC dates
- Re: Proposed text for clarifying protocol conformance
- Minutes
- Proposed text for clarifying protocol conformance
- [Fwd: Zakim teleconference bridge is down]
- Re: Copyright of test materials
- Re: Getting ready to publish our documents (pubrules etc.)
- Re: Fwd: SPARQL 1.1 security considerations
- Re: Getting ready to publish our documents (pubrules etc.)
- SPARQL TC 2012-01-03
- Fwd: SPARQL 1.1 security considerations
Monday, 2 January 2012
- Re: Getting ready to publish our documents (pubrules etc.)
- Re: Getting ready to publish our documents (pubrules etc.)