On Mon, 2012-01-09 at 16:32 -0500, Lee Feigenbaum wrote: > Let's see if we can make any progress in 3 areas tomorrow: > > 1) Graph State Protocol to last call (see recent thread from Sandro); > Chime won't be on the call, but let's make what progress we can. (Oh no, now I've gotten you saying Graph *State* too!) I'm at some risk for today, in that I'm coming from the dentist and they might run late. Maybe we can move this to the second half of the hour? Anyway, I made a different-approach compromise proposal in email just sent to Andy [1]. You can skip to the last section of my reply text, for the actual proposal. -- Sandro > 2) CSV/TSV document. > * I've expressed hesitation in the past with the fact the differences > between the CSV and TSV formats in the document > (http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/csv-tsv-results/results-csv-tsv.html), > specifically with respect to the encoding of RDF terms in the TSV format > and not in the CSV format. > > 3) Test suite status & actions for all documents > > We have regrets from Chime, Axel, and Carlos. > > Zakim is up and running so we'll use the standard call-in information. > > Lee > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012JanMar/0052.htmlReceived on Tuesday, 10 January 2012 13:32:36 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:01:10 UTC