- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 08:37:02 -0500
- To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Apologies for the very late agenda. A bit of a miscommunication between us chairs. Last week's minutes are at: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2012-01-17 Today I'd like to discuss: * Test approvals * The implementation report at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/implementations/ shows tests that are / are not approved * I'd like to go over this, and propose approving all tests that are passed by both ARQ and RDF::Query. * We can then focus on tests that are failed by one or the other or not run by both. * CSV/TSV * A brief mail thread at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2011JulSep/0075.html * We approved test cases in http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2011-08-16, with a bit of discussion about the difference between the formats (CSV is values only, TSV has full term information) * I'd like to at least discuss this: if I'm the only person uncomfortable with the two formats, then I'll let it go... Lee
Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2012 13:37:34 UTC