Re: SPARQL Telco tomorrow.

My regrets tomorrow, next week, and possibly the week after. Baby coming.

Lee

On 2/6/2012 1:26 PM, Axel Polleres wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> we'll continue where we stopped last time, but I would like to prioritize the LC comments, i.e.
> proposed order of the agenda:
>
> 1) Comments (JP-4, MO-1)
> 2) continue approving test cases
> 3) where are we regarding LC publication of GSP and CSV/TSV?
> 4) ACTION review
>
> Details at:
>   http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2012-02-07
>
> Agenda-2012-02-07
>
> 
>
> [edit] Call in details
>
> 
> When joining please don't identify yourself verbally; instead, identify yourself to Zakim on IRC
>
>  • Date of Call: Tuesday February 07, 2012
>  • Time of Call: 15:00 UK, 10:00 (East US)
>  • Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge, MA)
>  • Dial-In #: +33.4.26.46.79.03 (France)
>  • Dial-In #: +44.203.318.0479 (UK)
>  • Participant Access Code: 77277# (SPARQ)
>  • IRC Channel: irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #sparql ([irc:irc.w3.org:6665/sparql])
>  • Web-based IRC (member-only): http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc (Firefox IRC addon: chatzilla)
>  • Duration: 60 minutes
>  • Chair: Axel Polleres
>  • Scribe: Alex Passant (Scribe List)
>  • Link to Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2012-02-07
> [edit] Agenda
>
>  • Admin (10min)
>   • PROPOSED: Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2012-01-31
>   • Next regular meeting: 2012-02-14 @ 15:00 UK / 10:00 EST (scribe: cf. scribe_list)
>   • RDF WG liaison
>  • Comments:
>   • JP-4 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2012Jan/0009.html
>   • MO-1 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2012Jan/0010.html
>  • Tests/Implementations (http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/TestSuiteCoverage, http://w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/summary.html)
>   • Any updates to http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/implementations/ anyone?
>   • Any reports on "entailment regimes"?
>   • PROPOSED: Approve all test cases at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/implementations/ with status "not classified" that are passed by at least two implementations.
>   • What's the status of SD?
>  • Status of GSP and CSV/TSV publications
>  • ACTION review
>  • AOB
>
> [edit] Regrets
>
> Lee
>
>
>
>
>

Received on Monday, 6 February 2012 19:58:04 UTC