- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 13:58:25 -0500
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 1/10/2012 8:30 AM, Sandro Hawke wrote: > On Mon, 2012-01-09 at 16:32 -0500, Lee Feigenbaum wrote: >> Let's see if we can make any progress in 3 areas tomorrow: >> >> 1) Graph State Protocol to last call (see recent thread from Sandro); >> Chime won't be on the call, but let's make what progress we can. > > (Oh no, now I've gotten you saying Graph *State* too!) For the record, I attribute this more to my brain being used to using GSP as an acronym for Garden _State_ Parkway then to anything else. :-) Lee > > I'm at some risk for today, in that I'm coming from the dentist and they > might run late. Maybe we can move this to the second half of the hour? > Anyway, I made a different-approach compromise proposal in email just > sent to Andy [1]. You can skip to the last section of my reply text, > for the actual proposal. > > -- Sandro > >> 2) CSV/TSV document. >> * I've expressed hesitation in the past with the fact the differences >> between the CSV and TSV formats in the document >> (http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/csv-tsv-results/results-csv-tsv.html), >> specifically with respect to the encoding of RDF terms in the TSV format >> and not in the CSV format. >> >> 3) Test suite status& actions for all documents >> >> We have regrets from Chime, Axel, and Carlos. >> >> Zakim is up and running so we'll use the standard call-in information. >> >> Lee >> >> > > [1] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012JanMar/0052.html > >
Received on Tuesday, 10 January 2012 18:58:57 UTC