Re: Proposed text for clarifying protocol conformance

looks good to me!

best,
Axel

On 3 Jan 2012, at 16:55, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:

> In http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/protocol-1.1/Overview.xml#conformance
> 
> """
> A conformant SPARQL Protocol service:
> 
>    1. must implement either the query operation or the update operation
> in the way described in this document ("SPARQL 1.1 Protocol");
> 
>    2. may implement both the query and update operations;
> 
>    3. must implement all three forms of the query operation (query via
> GET, query via POST with URL-encoded parameters, and query via POST
> directly) if it implements the query operation
> 
>    4. must implement both forms of the update operation (update via POST
> with URL-encoded parameters and update via POST directly) if it
> implements the update operation
> 
>    5. must be consistent with the normative constraints on SPARQL
> Protocol services (indicated by [RFC2119] keywords) described in 4.
> Policy Considerations.
> 
> A conformant SPARQL Protocol client:
> 
>    1. must generate requests for either the query operation or the
> update operation;
> 
>    2. may generate requests for both the query and update operations;
> 
>    3. may generate requests for any or all of the three forms of the
> query operations if it generates query requests;
> 
>    4. may generate requests for either or both of the two forms of the
> update operations if it generates update requests;
> 
>    5. must be consistent with the normative constraints on SPARQL
> Protocol clients (indicated by [RFC2119] keywords) described in 4.
> Policy Considerations.
> """
> 
> Any suggested changes or support for this?
> 
> Lee
> 
>