- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 17:19:41 +0000
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
I've read the PROV Primer and PROV AQ, although not with the intent to review, rather to understand the key points coming out of the prov-WG. I'm happy to reread and comment for the WG in a week or so - but not just at the moment. The focus is provenance of things with IRIs, processes applied and agents involved. "entities" are as far as I could see, AWWW resources but there is an emphasis on being part of rsources as well (chart in document). A couple of areas that might be worth looking at from a SPARQL point-of-view (I'd need to go back and check details before saying these are comments): 1/ Service description: they have a provenance service description framework but the format is not fixed. The examples in the doc are JSON so they can't be merged into a SPARQL SD. If the provenance service is also a SPARQL endpoint there's a danger of wanting two sets of information at the same point - better to make RDF first-class and then it can be in a SPARQL SD. 2/ (point comment) There's a couple of SPARQL queries as illustrations and a comment on restricting properties to namespaces. The SPARQL 1.1 idiom: FILTER strstarts(str(?p), str(prov:)) does that filtering. Andy On 11/01/12 14:27, Lee Feigenbaum wrote: > The Provenance Working Group has published a first public working draft > of a document on accessing and querying provenance information. > > The document is at: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-aq/ > > It has several sections that may relate to our work. In particular: > > * It talks about how to go from a resource to provenance information > about the resource > > * It talks about how to query provenance information > > I'd like to ask for a volunteer / volunteers to review this document so > that we (as a WG) can send feedback (if any) to the provenance group. > > thanks, > Lee >
Received on Sunday, 15 January 2012 17:20:30 UTC