public-rdf-dawg@w3.org from January to March 2012 by author

Alexandre Passant

• Fwd: Today's minutes (Tuesday, 7 February)

Andy Seaborne

• Definitions for option 6 (part 2 of 2) (Friday, 30 March)
• Description and thoughts behind option 6 (part 1 of 2) (Friday, 30 March)
• RDF-WG to SPARQL-WG: request to consider a change to SPARQL prefix name token syntax. (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: ACTION-593: SPARQL CSV/TSV review (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: property paths (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: today's SPARQL agenda (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: today's SPARQL agenda (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: today's SPARQL agenda (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Property Path Cardinality Mixing (Sunday, 18 March)
• Re: DISTINCT() (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: DISTINCT() (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: DISTINCT() (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Defining property paths (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: Defining property paths (Monday, 12 March)
• Re: SPARQL TC 2012-03-13 : Status? (Monday, 12 March)
• SPARQL TC 2012-03-12 : Status? (Monday, 12 March)
• Re: Defining property paths (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Defining property paths (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: review of CSV/TSV (ACTION-594) (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Defining property paths (Friday, 2 March)
• Defining property paths (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: comments JP-4 how to proceed? (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Property path summary and ways forward (Monday, 27 February)
• Property path summary and ways forward (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: addressing JP-5 (Monday, 27 February)
• Property Paths Use Case (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: comments JP-4 how to proceed? (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Errata : grammar : problem with compound subject nodes and property paths. (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: Graph store protocol editor's draft updated (Wednesday, 15 February)
• Re: Graph store protocol editor's draft updated (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Property Paths and Entailment (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: Comment response: DB-18 (Escapes in prefix names) (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: Comment response: DB-18 (Escapes in prefix names) (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: summary on options for JP-4 Comment about the semantics of property paths (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Comment on SPARQL 1.1 CSV Results (Monday, 13 February)
• Comment response: DB-18 (Escapes in prefix names) (Sunday, 12 February)
• Comment response: DB-17 (feedback on percent encoding in prefix names) (Sunday, 12 February)
• Comment response: DB-19 (decimal syntax) (Sunday, 12 February)
• Re: summary on options for JP-4 Comment about the semantics of property paths (Sunday, 12 February)
• Re: summary on options for JP-4 Comment about the semantics of property paths (Saturday, 11 February)
• Re: summary on options for JP-4 Comment about the semantics of property paths (Saturday, 11 February)
• License on test generator script Re: Draft text for asking for implementation reports (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: MO-1 draft response (ACTION-588) (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Draft text for asking for implementation reports (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Re: Comments about the semantics of property paths (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: Comment on SPARQL 1.1 CSV Results (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: EARL instructions for SPARQL 1.1 test suite? (Friday, 3 February)
• Re: comment response for MO-1 (Tuesday, 31 January)
• Re: new test cases (Tuesday, 31 January)
• Re: Fwd: Comments about the semantics of property paths (Sunday, 29 January)
• Fwd: Comments about the semantics of property paths (Saturday, 28 January)
• Federated query tests - experiences (Friday, 27 January)
• Re: ACTION-575: Propose tests for ADD, MOVE, and COPY (Thursday, 26 January)
• Re: Test functions/if01.rq (Tuesday, 24 January)
• Re: Test functions/if01.rq (Tuesday, 24 January)
• Test functions/if01.rq (Tuesday, 24 January)
• Minute of the meeting 2012-01-24 (Tuesday, 24 January)
• Re: ACTION-575: Propose tests for ADD, MOVE, and COPY (Tuesday, 24 January)
• Re: ACTION-574: positive EXISTS tests (Wednesday, 18 January)
• Regrets for telecon of 2012-01-17 (Monday, 16 January)
• Re: Looking to review Provenance Access & Query document (Sunday, 15 January)
• Re: Copyright of test materials (Tuesday, 10 January)
• Re: next steps on http graph store protocol (Tuesday, 10 January)
• Re: next steps on http graph store protocol (Tuesday, 10 January)
• Re: next steps on http graph store protocol (Tuesday, 10 January)
• Re: next steps on http graph store protocol (Tuesday, 10 January)
• Re: next steps on http graph store protocol (Tuesday, 10 January)
• Re: next steps on http graph store protocol (Sunday, 8 January)
• Re: Publications ready to go (almost) (Thursday, 5 January)
• Re: Proposed text for clarifying protocol conformance (Wednesday, 4 January)
• Re: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:NL-1 (Wednesday, 4 January)
• Re: Getting ready to publish our documents (pubrules etc.) (Tuesday, 3 January)
• Re: Fwd: SPARQL 1.1 security considerations (Tuesday, 3 January)

Axel Polleres

• today's minutes (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: ACTION-598 Open comments (Monday, 5 March)
• SPARQL TC 2012-03-06 (Monday, 5 March)
• ACTION-598 Open comments (Monday, 5 March)
• @Editors: Acknowledgements sections for all drafts... (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Graph store protocol editor's draft updated (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Property path summary and ways forward (Monday, 27 February)
• addressing JP-5 (was: Re: comments JP-4 how to proceed?) (Monday, 27 February)
• thoughts on SPARQL WG schedule (Monday, 27 February)
• SPARQL TelCo 2012-02-28 (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: comments JP-4 how to proceed? (Monday, 27 February)
• comments JP-4 how to proceed? (Tuesday, 21 February)
• chairing problem and Agenda SPARQL TC 2012-02-21 (Monday, 20 February)
• Fwd: SPARQL Telco today: Agenda (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: Comment response: DB-18 (Escapes in prefix names) (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: Comment response: DB-19 (decimal syntax) (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: Comment response: DB-17 (feedback on percent encoding in prefix names) (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: MO-1 draft response (ACTION-588) (Sunday, 12 February)
• Re: summary on options for JP-4 Comment about the semantics of property paths (Sunday, 12 February)
• Re: summary on options for JP-4 Comment about the semantics of property paths (Saturday, 11 February)
• Re: summary on options for JP-4 Comment about the semantics of property paths (Saturday, 11 February)
• Re: summary on options for JP-4 Comment about the semantics of property paths (Saturday, 11 February)
• Re: summary on options for JP-4 Comment about the semantics of property paths (Saturday, 11 February)
• summary on options for JP-4 Comment about the semantics of property paths (Thursday, 9 February)
• SPARQL Telco tomorrow. (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: Comments about the semantics of property paths (Thursday, 2 February)
• Re: Agenda Telco Today (Tuesday, 31 January)
• Agenda Telco Today (Tuesday, 31 January)
• regrets for tomorrow & next steps (Monday, 9 January)
• Re: Publications ready to go (almost) (Thursday, 5 January)
• Publications ready to go (almost) (Thursday, 5 January)
• Re: Minutes (Wednesday, 4 January)
• Re: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:NL-1 (Wednesday, 4 January)
• Re: LC dates (Wednesday, 4 January)
• http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:NL-1 (Wednesday, 4 January)
• Re: Proposed text for clarifying protocol conformance (Tuesday, 3 January)
• Re: Copyright of test materials (Tuesday, 3 January)
• SPARQL TC 2012-01-03 (Tuesday, 3 January)
• Fwd: SPARQL 1.1 security considerations (Tuesday, 3 January)
• Re: Getting ready to publish our documents (pubrules etc.) (Monday, 2 January)

Birte Glimm

• Re: today's SPARQL agenda (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: Defining property paths (Monday, 12 March)
• Re: Comments about the semantics of property paths (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: Graph store protocol editor's draft updated (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: Graph store protocol editor's draft updated (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: Publications ready to go (almost) (Thursday, 5 January)
• Minutes (Tuesday, 3 January)
• Re: Getting ready to publish our documents (pubrules etc.) (Sunday, 1 January)

Carlos Buil Aranda

• today's minutes (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Tomorrow's SPARQL WG Call (Tuesday, 17 January)
• Re: regrets for tomorrow & next steps (Monday, 9 January)

Chime Ogbuji

• Re: Getting ready to publish our documents (pubrules etc.) (Tuesday, 3 January)

Chimezie Ogbuji

• ACTION-593: SPARQL CSV/TSV review (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: today's SPARQL agenda (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: @Editors: Acknowledgements sections for all drafts... (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: SPARQL TC 2012-03-06 (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Graph store protocol editor's draft updated (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Graph store protocol editor's draft updated (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: Graph store protocol editor's draft updated (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: Graph store protocol editor's draft updated (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: Graph store protocol editor's draft updated (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: EARL instructions for SPARQL 1.1 test suite? (Sunday, 5 February)
• Graph store protocol editor's draft updated (Friday, 3 February)
• EARL instructions for SPARQL 1.1 test suite? (Friday, 3 February)
• Upcoming regrets (Sunday, 8 January)

Eric Prud'hommeaux

• Re: Comment on SPARQL 1.1 CSV Results (Monday, 6 February)

Gregory Williams

• Re: Description and thoughts behind option 6 (part 1 of 2) (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: property paths (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: property paths (Monday, 26 March)
• property paths (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: today's SPARQL agenda (Tuesday, 20 March)
• review of CSV/TSV (ACTION-594) (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: addressing JP-5 (was: Re: comments JP-4 how to proceed?) (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: comments JP-4 how to proceed? (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: chairing problem and Agenda SPARQL TC 2012-02-21 (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: chairing problem and Agenda SPARQL TC 2012-02-21 (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: Graph store protocol editor's draft updated (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: Graph store protocol editor's draft updated (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: Graph store protocol editor's draft updated (Friday, 17 February)
• Minutes (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: summary on options for JP-4 Comment about the semantics of property paths (Saturday, 11 February)
• Re: Draft text for asking for implementation reports (Saturday, 11 February)
• Re: summary on options for JP-4 Comment about the semantics of property paths (Saturday, 11 February)
• Re: summary on options for JP-4 Comment about the semantics of property paths (Saturday, 11 February)
• Re: summary on options for JP-4 Comment about the semantics of property paths (Saturday, 11 February)
• Re: summary on options for JP-4 Comment about the semantics of property paths (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: Draft text for asking for implementation reports (Wednesday, 8 February)
• MO-1 draft response (ACTION-588) (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: comment response for MO-1 (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: Comment on SPARQL 1.1 CSV Results (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: Comment on SPARQL 1.1 CSV Results (Sunday, 5 February)
• Re: COPY/MOVE tests (Friday, 3 February)
• COPY/MOVE tests (Friday, 3 February)
• Re: EARL instructions for SPARQL 1.1 test suite? (Friday, 3 February)
• Re: EARL instructions for SPARQL 1.1 test suite? (Friday, 3 February)
• new test cases (Tuesday, 31 January)
• comment response for MO-1 (Tuesday, 31 January)
• Re: ACTION-575: Propose tests for ADD, MOVE, and COPY (Thursday, 26 January)
• ACTION-580: new implementations report (Tuesday, 24 January)
• Re: Test functions/if01.rq (Tuesday, 24 January)
• Re: ACTION-575: Propose tests for ADD, MOVE, and COPY (Tuesday, 24 January)
• ACTION-574: positive EXISTS tests (Tuesday, 17 January)
• mintues (Tuesday, 10 January)
• Re: next steps on http graph store protocol (Friday, 6 January)
• Re: next steps on http graph store protocol (Friday, 6 January)
• Re: Publications ready to go (almost) (Thursday, 5 January)
• LC dates (Tuesday, 3 January)

Ian Jacobs

• Call for Exclusions (Update): SPARQL 1.1 Overview (Thursday, 16 February)
• Call for Exclusions: Five SPARQL 1.1 Specifications (Thursday, 5 January)

Lee Feigenbaum

• SPARQL WG minutes (Tuesday, 20 March)
• today's SPARQL agenda (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: DISTINCT() (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: summary on options for JP-4 Comment about the semantics of property paths (Saturday, 11 February)
• Re: summary on options for JP-4 Comment about the semantics of property paths (Saturday, 11 February)
• Re: summary on options for JP-4 Comment about the semantics of property paths (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: SPARQL Telco tomorrow. (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: Comment on SPARQL 1.1 CSV Results (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: Comment on SPARQL 1.1 CSV Results (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: Comment on SPARQL 1.1 CSV Results (Sunday, 5 February)
• Re: Fwd: Comments about the semantics of property paths (Sunday, 29 January)
• Re: Fwd: Comments about the semantics of property paths (Sunday, 29 January)
• Re: Minute of the meeting 2012-01-24 (Tuesday, 24 January)
• Today's SPARQL WG Agenda (Tuesday, 24 January)
• Tomorrow's SPARQL WG Call (Tuesday, 17 January)
• Looking to review Provenance Access & Query document (Wednesday, 11 January)
• Re: SPARQL WG Agenda for 2012-Jan-10 (Tuesday, 10 January)
• Today's resolutions on graph store protocol (Tuesday, 10 January)
• SPARQL WG Agenda for 2012-Jan-10 (Monday, 9 January)
• Proposed text for clarifying protocol conformance (Tuesday, 3 January)

Marcelo Arenas

• Comments about the complexity of evaluating property paths (Wednesday, 15 February)

Matthew Perry

• Re: Description and thoughts behind option 6 (part 1 of 2) (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: ACTION-597: Review Overview doc for LC readiness by completion of ACTION-595 (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: summary on options for JP-4 Comment about the semantics of property paths (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: COPY/MOVE tests (Friday, 3 February)
• Re: COPY/MOVE tests (Friday, 3 February)
• Today's Minutes (Tuesday, 31 January)
• Re: Agenda Telco Today (Tuesday, 31 January)
• Re: ACTION-575: Propose tests for ADD, MOVE, and COPY (Friday, 20 January)

Olivier Corby

• Re: DISTINCT() (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: DISTINCT() (Wednesday, 14 March)
• regrets (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Regrets (Tuesday, 10 January)

Paul Gearon

• Minutes for March 27 teleconf (Tuesday, 27 March)
• apologies (Tuesday, 6 March)
• regrets (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Unavailable for February 7 telecom (Monday, 6 February)
• Meeting minutes 17 Jan 2012 (Tuesday, 17 January)

Polleres, Axel

• RE: property paths (Tuesday, 27 March)
• RE: property paths (Monday, 26 March)
• SPARQL TC 2012-03-27: Agenda (Monday, 26 March)
• Overview document (ACTION-595) (Monday, 26 March)
• RE: property paths (Monday, 26 March)
• at risk (Monday, 19 March)
• RE: DISTINCT() (Wednesday, 14 March)
• RE: DISTINCT() (Wednesday, 14 March)
• DISTINCT() (Wednesday, 14 March)
• SPARQL TC 2012-03-13 : minutes (Wednesday, 14 March)
• RE: SPARQL TC 2012-03-13 : Status? (Monday, 12 March)
• RE: Defining property paths (Sunday, 11 March)
• RE: Defining property paths (Thursday, 8 March)
• RE: Defining property paths (Thursday, 8 March)

Sandro Hawke

• RE: SPARQL TC 2012-03-13 : Status? (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Meeting times 1hr earlier in europre, next two weeks. (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: @Editors: Acknowledgements sections for all drafts... (Tuesday, 28 February)
• today's minutes (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: chairing problem and Agenda SPARQL TC 2012-02-21 (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Graph store protocol editor's draft updated (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Graph store protocol editor's draft updated (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Graph store protocol editor's draft updated (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: chairing problem and Agenda SPARQL TC 2012-02-21 (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Graph store protocol editor's draft updated (Wednesday, 15 February)
• Re: Graph store protocol editor's draft updated (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: Graph store protocol editor's draft updated (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Graph store protocol editor's draft updated (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: SPARQL Telco tomorrow. (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: Today's SPARQL WG Agenda (Tuesday, 24 January)
• Re: Tomorrow's SPARQL WG Call (Tuesday, 17 January)
• Re: next steps on http graph store protocol (Tuesday, 10 January)
• Re: next steps on http graph store protocol (Tuesday, 10 January)
• Re: SPARQL WG Agenda for 2012-Jan-10 (Tuesday, 10 January)
• Re: next steps on http graph store protocol (Tuesday, 10 January)
• Re: next steps on http graph store protocol (Monday, 9 January)
• Re: next steps on http graph store protocol (Monday, 9 January)
• Re: next steps on http graph store protocol (Saturday, 7 January)
• Re: next steps on http graph store protocol (Friday, 6 January)
• next steps on http graph store protocol (Friday, 6 January)
• Re: Questions and comments on SPARQL 1.1 Graph Store HTTP Protocol draft (Friday, 6 January)
• Re: Minutes (Thursday, 5 January)
• [Fwd: Zakim teleconference bridge is down] (Tuesday, 3 January)
• Re: Getting ready to publish our documents (pubrules etc.) (Monday, 2 January)

Steve Harris

• Re: today's SPARQL agenda (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: today's SPARQL agenda (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: DISTINCT() (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: DISTINCT() (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Defining property paths (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: Defining property paths (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: SPARQL TelCo 2012-02-28 (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: chairing problem and Agenda SPARQL TC 2012-02-21 (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Change to Query CVS version, v1.338 (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: Comment response: DB-18 (Escapes in prefix names) (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: Comment response: DB-18 (Escapes in prefix names) (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Comment response: DB-19 (decimal syntax) (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Comment response: DB-17 (feedback on percent encoding in prefix names) (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Comment on SPARQL 1.1 CSV Results (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: Tomorrow's SPARQL WG Call (Tuesday, 17 January)
• Re: next steps on http graph store protocol (Tuesday, 10 January)
• Re: next steps on http graph store protocol (Tuesday, 10 January)
• Re: next steps on http graph store protocol (Tuesday, 10 January)
• Re: next steps on http graph store protocol (Tuesday, 10 January)
• Re: next steps on http graph store protocol (Monday, 9 January)
• Re: regrets for tomorrow & next steps (Monday, 9 January)
• Re: next steps on http graph store protocol (Monday, 9 January)
• Re: next steps on http graph store protocol (Monday, 9 January)
• Re: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:NL-1 (Wednesday, 4 January)
• Re: Proposed text for clarifying protocol conformance (Tuesday, 3 January)

Last message date: Friday, 30 March 2012 18:38:48 UTC