- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 09:19:36 +0000
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On 27/02/12 20:49, Gregory Williams wrote: > On Feb 27, 2012, at 7:35 AM, Axel Polleres wrote: > >>> I willing to spec for 2.1 (DISTINCT modifier on path components) >>> but not in the framework you outlined in the telecon which was to >>> produce all the spec material, then decide which option the WG >>> will pursue. I don't think people will engage in a process to >>> come up with the necessary design on the basis it might all be >>> thrown out based on reasons we have before the spec work starts. >> >> Ok, so how do the other s think here? Andy's is the only answer I >> got. Given that he volunteers to spec it out, can we have a vote on >> whether we are willing to bring this into the spec (particularly, >> also as there was a slight majority on the call two weeks ago for >> the DISTINCT() option): >> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2012-02-14#line0064 > > I'm not sure when I'd have time to actually implement the new > semantics, but I'm willing to support this plan so long as we believe > it will satisfy those commenters who have indicated resistance to the > current state of property paths. Good point - maybe we should send a intermediate response when we have decided on the plan to get feedback sooner rather than later. Andy
Received on Tuesday, 28 February 2012 09:20:06 UTC