W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: Graph store protocol editor's draft updated

From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:57:41 -0500
To: Chimezie Ogbuji <chimezie@gmail.com>
Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <1329163061.16744.265.camel@waldron>
On the resolution to the POST=merge issue, where we resolved:

        RESOLVED: The Graph Store Protocol explicitly applies only to
        SPARQL 1.1 Graph Stores
I'm not seeing anything explicit.   For instance, we could change the
abstract to this:

        This document describes how to use HTTP operations to manage the
        RDF graphs stored by a SPARQL 1.1 graph store.  This RESTful
        interface is an alternative to the SPARQL 1.1 Update protocol.
        Most of the operations defined here can be performed using that
        interface, but for some clients or servers, this interface may
        be easier to implement or work with.  This specification may
        serve as a suggestion but it not normative for HTTP operations
        on RDF graphs which are managed outside of a SPARQL 1.1 graph

... and maybe also work that last sentence (or something like it) into
the introduction.

    -- Sandro
Received on Monday, 13 February 2012 19:57:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:01:10 UTC