- From: Chimezie Ogbuji <chimezie@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2012 13:08:38 -0500
- To: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
- Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKSO3un4R5inq_-R7LSaKrGJnA=OuoOReoN_X9o4=Bg1pGEQoQ@mail.gmail.com>
Initial EARL-generating run of FuXi (1.4 SPARQL 1.1 Entailment Regime test EARL) - see attached EARL/DOAP/FOAF N3 document - for implementation report. The following tests were skipped (for now): Skipping (rdf01) Quantification over predicates Skipping (rdf02) Reification Skipping (rdfs01) Quantification over predicates Skipping (rdfs05) Quantification over predicates (unary) Skipping (rdfs11) Reflexivity of rdfs:subClassOf (?x -> rdfs:Container) On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com> wrote: > On Feb 2, 2012, at 9:24 PM, Chimezie Ogbuji wrote: > >> I was planning on generating some EARL for FuXi's implementation of >> several of the SPARQL 1.1 Entailment Regimes, this weekend. Is the >> format of the EARL the same as it was in SPARQL 1.0 or are there some >> documented differences? > > I believe it's the same as 1.0, but to be honest, in developing the implementations report code I based my work on existing EARL data, not any documentation. There's a link to the EARL files that I'm currently able to work with at the bottom of the implementations report: > > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/implementations/ > > The one possible addition to the 1.0-style EARL that would help me with the reports is if you could make earl:subject point at a IRI (not a bnode), and have that thing use doap:name to give it a name ("FuXi") suitable for the column heading in the implementation report. > > thanks, > .greg >
Attachments
- application/octet-stream attachment: FuXi.sparql11-entailment-earl.n3
Received on Sunday, 5 February 2012 18:09:29 UTC