- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 10:07:10 -0500
- To: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
- Cc: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 10:40 -0500, Gregory Williams wrote:
> On Feb 21, 2012, at 8:39 AM, Sandro Hawke wrote:
>
> >> ** In case they're in publishable state, this should be recorded, otherwise the schedule for publications should be discussed and reviews should be solicited, if needed (IIUC, we had reviews from Birte and Sandro already for GSP)
> >> * Tests/Implementations (http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/TestSuiteCoverage, http://w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/summary.html)
> >> * Any reports on "entailment regimes"?
> >> * What's the status of SD?
> >
> > On the SD testing service, I'm thinking the best option for now is for
> > to pick a w3 ULR like 2009/sparql/sdvalidator and proxy that over to
> > Greg's machine. That way no w3c system resources are needed right now,
> > and it can be moved to w3.org later without users knowing about the
> > change. Greg, if you just tell me the two URLs (or URL patterns), I
> > can set up the .htaccess line. (or maybe you can, given CVS access to
> > SPARQL WG space.)
>
> http://kasei.us/2009/09/sparql/sdvalidator.cgi
Done, at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/sdvalidator with the apache rule:
RewriteRule sdvalidator(.*)$
http://kasei.us/2009/09/sparql/sdvalidator.cgi$1 [P]
Please try it out.
-- Sandro
Received on Tuesday, 28 February 2012 15:07:29 UTC